Autostrada A1 București-Nădlac

Started by Ionut, September 13, 2011, 12:10:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

1 Member and 84 Guests are viewing this topic.

ciprebbe

Asa poate inauguram si zboruri nocturne cu drona:)))

Poate paznicii sa "lucreze"la ora asta.
Mai bine sa ratacesti in padure decat fara padure!
E-republik

A3-UMB-5 alunecari>20m - 1000ron Ciprebbe

teea

#28441
@ adrian : pozele au cel putin o luna....
Sa gindesti este dificil. De aceea, majoritatea oamenilor doar judeca ! Carl Gustav Jung

GDPR

Pozele sunt mai vechi evident (daca dai search pe forum le gasesti imediat), dar in luna asta s-a modificat geometria rambleurilor sau natura pamantului de umplutura? Of course not, this is my point.

Redox

Trec pe la ora 16 prin zona OS3, o să vă anunț dacă se vede ceva mișcare sau nu.

mariansb

Azi la 8 trecând prin nodul de la Saliste am vazut 2 camioane în mers și un compactor , care treceau de zona unde e blocat accesul spre Sebes și se îndreptau spre viaduct.
"Un popor care alege politicieni corupti, impostori, hoti, tradatori , nu este victima, ci complice." - George Orwell

anacronox

tocmai a trecut un elicopter al Unitatii Speciale de Aviatie Eurocopter Dauphin inscriptionat cu Guvernul Romaniei pe deasupra Devei si parea ca aterizeaza in zona Soimus.
Avem ceva vizite prin zona azi?

TibiV

Sigur nu este Cioloş...
Premierul este la o conferință în București unde tocmai vorbește despre pachetul de legi al achizițiilor publice.
Mama proștilor este mereu gravidă... :)

stanculescu.dan

Zbor de instructie probabil. Au zburat si ieri la Craiova.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk



GDPR

#28449
Articolul pare ca e o gluma, dar de fapt cred ca e parte din strategia de reglare de conturi intre gasti. Avansul se plateste conform prevederilor contractului si se recupereaza proportional (sau sume fixe prestabilite) din situatiile de lucrari. De ce ar trebui justificat cu facturi? E drept ca practica curenta spune ca trebuie acoperit de un "on-demand advance payment bond" cu valoare egala cu a sumei platite in avans, dar asta nu e subiectul articolului.

LE Uite un exemplu de sub-clauza din conditiile particulare ale unui contract de tip FIDIC Galben care se refera la avans:

QuoteThe Employer will make interest-free advance payments to the Contractor for his mobilization. The total of such advance payments and the number and timing of instalments (if more than one), shall be as stated in the Appendix to Tender. The Engineer shall issue an Interim Payment Certificate for the first instalment within [•] days after the Contractor has delivered, to the Employer, an irrevocable, unconditional advance payment bank guarantee, payable upon first written demand, issued by a first class international bank approved by the Employer in the amount equivalent to the advance payments made by the Employer in Euros [EUR] and identified in the Appendix to Tender. Such bank guarantee shall remain effective until the advance payments have been repaid by the Contractor to the Employer in full (which shall be the date of the Completion of Works, unless otherwise mutually agreed and confirmed in writing by the Employer and the Contractor), but its amount shall be progressively reduced by the amount repaid by the Contractor as indicated in Interim Payment Certificates. The advance payment shall be paid by the Employer to the Contractor within [•] days after such Interim Payment Certificate has been delivered to the Employer.

Iar modelul de scrisoare de garantie bancara poate fi urmatorul:

QuoteWhereas:
* a Design & Build Contract has been concluded between [•] (the "Employer") and [•] (the "Contractor") on Contract Agreement dated [•], for performing/rendering certain construction and design works/services necessary for the successful completion of [•] Project, for the total Remuneration of EUR [•], where the Contractor is your contractor under such Contract and wishes to receive an advance payment, for which the Contract requires him to obtain a guarantee;
* terms of the Contract provides that the Contractor shall issue an irrevocable, unconditional bank guarantee, payable upon first written demand, issued by a first class international bank in favour of the Employer for an amount of [•], representing the value of the advance payment to be received by the Contractor under the Contract; this guarantee represents a guarantee for the advance payment disbursement by the Contractor to the Employer covering the same amount that the Contractor will receive from the Employer, as established in the Contract.

we,  [bank], hereby waive all rights of objection and defence which may be available to us and establish this guarantee upon the request of the Contractor and irrevocably and unconditionally undertake to pay you upon your first demand, within [•] working days, and without any other formality being needed any amount(s) you may claim, up to but not exceeding the aggregate amount of EUR [•] upon receipt of your first written demand stating the amount which the Contractor has failed to repay in accordance with the above mentioned Contract.

The amount(s) shall be payable in RON at the National Bank of Romania's exchange rate valid for the date of any such payment.

The Employer shall be entitled to make several requests for payment under this bank guarantee, provided that the total amount is not exceeding EUR [•]. The total amount of this guarantee shall be reduced by any payment effected by us hereunder.
This guarantee shall be effective starting with the date of receiving by the Contractor of the advance payment in the amount of [•], in RON equivalent, into their account no. [•] and shall remain valid and enforceable until [•] [the Expiry Date].

This guarantee shall be reduced progressively by the amount repaid by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract provisions, upon presentation to us by the Contractor of copies of the following relevant documents: invoices and subject to your express confirmation signed by your legal representatives which signature is certified by your bankers or by a notary public.
Any demand for payment must contain your legal representative signature(s) which must be certified by your bankers or by a notary public. The demand must be received by us at this office [bank], on or before [•]. At Expiry Date the present guarantee shall automatically become null and void, irrespective of the actual return to us of the original of this guarantee document and no claim shall be honoured if received by us beyond this date.
We have been informed that the Employer may require the Contractor to extend this guarantee if the advance payment has not been repaid with 30 days prior to the Expiry Date. We undertake to pay you such guaranteed amount upon receipt by us, anytime within such a 30-day period before the Expiry Date, of your demand in writing and your written statement that the advance payment has not been repaid and that this guarantee has not been extended.

This guarantee shall be governed by the laws of Romania and shall be subject to the Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees, published as number 758, 2010 revision, by the International Chamber of Commerce.


carutasul

Quote from: gruiarew on May 06, 2016, 04:23:55 PM
Poate-și albeau dinții cu vopsea de marcaje. Eu unul am citit articolul de 5 ori și tot prost am rămas. Sigur nu-i o glumă? Adică... cum?
Posibil sa fie si un fel de raspuns la birocratia romaneasca. Asa cum eu am un contracte cu suma fixa pe luna, iar cand vine controlul la client il intreaba de ce nu are fisa de lucru pentru fiecare luna ( desi sunt luni in care nu fac nimic si mie mi se par absurde)   o fi fost replica vreunui sef de-al lor " trimite-le pe toate" cand au fost intrebati de facturi. Pana la urma, nu au contract cu suma fixa? Ce treaba are CNADNR-ul cu cheltuielile lor?

GDPR

Asta nu inteleg nici eu, de ce ar trebui avansul justificat cu facturi? Poate ne explica cineva.

disney

#28452
Aici gasiti raspunsul CNADNR referitor la nodul Grind si la faza 2.
Ei confirma ca totusi ar fi fost studiate patruzeci si opt de solutii de amenajare a nodului. :lol:

ovideatza

#28453
Legat de justificarea avansului, a fost dincolo o discutie mai in urma, probabil anul trecut.

Cand iei un avans pentru o lucrare, il iei cu scopul de a-l folosi exclusiv pentru acea lucrare.

Nelu Iordache a luat avans pt lotul lui si a trimis banii la BlueAir si si-a luat avion cu ei. Ori asta s-a dovedit (sau e in judecata) a fi fapta penala, cu consecintele stiute asupra Romstrade si a persoanei sale ca si administrator.

Acesta ar fi principiul.

Eu personal nu sunt 100% de acord cu el, as zice ca este un principiu excesiv de prudential.

Mi se pare corect ca eu ca firma sa folosesc avansurile in scopul finantarii tuturor lucrarilor pe care le am in derulare. Clar nu la albit dinti (si acolo e o discutie, pt ca daca face parte din pachetul salarial al managerului de proiect pana la urma asta e, se asimileaza salarizarii personalului implicat). Astfel ca antreprenor ti-ai dori sa ai posibilitatea ca dintr-un avans sa finantezi mai multe proiecte concomitent, generand crestere accelerata a ritmului de lucru al firmei tale.


INSA pericolul este de a se ajunge la o structura "domino". Adica daca se blocheaza un proiect, atunci ti se blocheaza toate. Iar un client de buna credinta iti plateste avans si tu ajungi in lipsa de lichiditati pe proiectul lui pt ca ai finantat alt proiect, etc.

Astfel principiul protejeaza practic impotriva deturnarii sumelor platite ca avans si aduce o garantie clientului ca lucrarea sa are o "baza materiala" pt implementare. Daca folosesti avansul conform clauzelor atunci vei aduce ca justificare facturi care sa dovedeasca utilizarea banilor in scopul pt care au fost atribuiti. Daca nu e asa se ajunge in domeniul penal posibil.

Ionut

Va rog sa nu deviem, deja suntem mult pe langa subiect (A1).