Chicago's O'Hare airport adds runway to cut delays, grow trafficQuoteChicago's O'Hare International Airport opened a new runway on Thursday, which the city hopes can cut delays by nearly half, and allow for nearly 90,000 additional annual flights as demand grows.
The 10,800-foot (3,292-meter) runway, built over the site of a former cemetery, is part of the airport's $8 billion modernization project. When the expansion is complete, O'Hare expects to have six east-west parallel runways and two "crosswind" runways.
O'Hare handles the second largest number of passengers in the nation after Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, according to the Airports Council International. It has been notorious for delays due to congestion and Chicago's often wild weather.
For the 12 months ending July, 68.3 percent of O'Hare's departures were on time, compared to 72.1 for all major airports, according to U.S. Department of Transportation statistics.
The modernization project has already added one other runway, expanded another and added a new traffic control tower.
DePaul University transportation professor Joseph Schwieterman noted that the first new runway primarily served to improve operations when the weather got bad, but this new one is about expansion.
"There are exciting opportunities for new services, particularly by low-cost carriers," said Schwieterman. "You can envision a new carrier muscling its way into O'Hare, with a boost in price competition."
The new 10C-28C runway is 200 feet (61 meters) wide and Chicago's first "Group VI" capable runway, meaning it can accommodate the largest aircraft, including the Boeing 747-8 and the A380. Traffic at O'Hare will now primarily flow to and from the east and west, which the city claims will increase maximum arrival and departure rates in all weathers, according to the city.
Not everyone is happy with the addition - neighborhood groups have complained that the new runway will increase noise pollution and air in Chicago's Northwest Side neighborhoods.
sursa (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/17/usa-chicago-ohare-expansion-idUSL1N0I728520131017)
(http://cbschicago.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/airplane_at_ohare.png)
Mumbai gets India's tallest Air Traffic Control towerQuoteIndia's tallest Air Traffic Control (ATC) tower - standing at 84 metres or nearly as high as a 30-storey building - was inaugurated outside the Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport here Friday.
[...]
Spread over a 2,800 square metre area, it is equipped with the latest technology, including electronic flight strips which will lessen the workload of the controllers, increase safety and overall capacity at the airport.
[...]
ATC tower highlights
- Tallest ATC tower in India. 83.8 m tall equal to 30 storey building
- 5 mile clear visibility for controllers
- Reinforced sandwich glass can withstand powerful winds
- Will enhance airport performance, capacity, efficiency and safety
(http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2013October/atc-1_660_101813115046.jpg)
(http://media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2013October/atc-2_moss_101813115046.jpg)
sursa (http://www.mid-day.com/news/2013/oct/181013-news-mumbai-airport-gets-indias-tallest-air-traffic-control-tower.htm)
The 'world's worst' airports for 2013 are...QuoteThe Philippines' main Manila airport terminal has been named the world's worst for the second year in a row in a survey by an online travel website.
Officials on Friday brushed off the survey results, insisting conditions were being improved.
"The Guide to Sleeping in Airports" website said Manila's crowded Terminal 1 was ranked the world's worst by travellers based on comfort, convenience, cleanliness and customer service.
Reviews posted on the site mentioned "dilapidated facilities", dishonest airport workers -- particularly taxi drivers -- long waiting times and rude officials.
"These are old issues," Terminal 1 manager Dante Basanta told AFP, adding that the problems were already being addressed by the government.
He conceded that the Manila airport, with a capacity of about 6.5 million passengers annually, was overstretched, handling 8.1 million travellers last year.
Terminal 1, the oldest of its four passenger terminals, was built 32 years ago.
The government has launched a 2.5-billion-peso ($58 million) renovation programme for the terminal.
It is also attempting to decongest it by moving at least three million passengers a year to a newer terminal.
World's Worst Airports for 2013
1. Manila NAIA (Terminal 1)
2. Bergamo
3. Calcutta
4. Islamabad
5. Paris Beauvais
6. Chennai
7. Frankfurt Hahn
8. Mumbai
9. Rome Flumicino
10. Los Angeles
(http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/4028/met2hires.jpg)
World's Best Airports for 2013
1. Singapore Changi
2. Seoul Incheon
3. Amsterdam
4. Hong Kong
5. Helsinki Vantaa
6. Munich
7. Zurich
8. Kuala Lumpur
9. Vancouver
10. Frankfurt am Main
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Singapore_Changi_Airport,_Terminal_1,_Departure_Hall_7,_Dec_05.JPG)
sursa (http://www.emirates247.com/the-world-s-worst-airports-for-2013-are-2013-10-18-1.524791)
Ce este cel mai impresionant este constructia unei infrastructuri adiacente demne de o mare metropola: autostrada speciala pentru aeroport(care face legatura cu orasul propriu zis), poduri uriase, trenuri rapide, toate doar pentru ca un aeroport sa functioneze la parametrii normali. Nu-i indeajuns doar doua piste si doau terminal-uri!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5TFPYlN5Zk
Calculasem la un moment dat pe metroousor numarul de pasageri/ora pe care se poate baza un sistem de transport intre Bucuresti si OTP (pornind de la milioanele de pasageri care trec anual prin aeroport); din cate tin minte a rezultat un numar relativ mic, usor de acoperit doar cu autobuze relativ frecvente - ceea ce avem deja. Dar privind in viitor cu siguranta ca e nevoie de conectarea aeroportului la A3 si la reteaua feroviara nationala.
World's latest mega-airport finally opens to passengers(http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/131028131059-dubai-new-airport-water-salute-horizontal-gallery.jpg)
QuoteDubai's aviation industry achieved its biggest milestone to date on Sunday, when the emirate's new airport welcomed the arrival of its first commercial flight.
Located in Jebel Ali and part of Dubai World Central, an "aviation city" that the government launched as a free economic zone, Al Maktoum International Airport is expected to become the world's largest airport upon completion.
Like the emirate's main airport, Dubai International Airport (located 50 kilometers to the north), Al Maktoum International Airport is owned by the government of Dubai and operated by Dubai Airports Company.
Although full commercial passenger services were originally scheduled for 2017, the mega project was delayed for years due to the regional financial crisis, and faces a new tentative completion date of 2027.
Various reports estimate the total cost of the project at 120 billion dirhams ($32.67 billion).
The airport has been open for cargo flights since 2010.
Opening ceremony
Hungarian low-cost airline Wizz Air was the first airline to be welcomed at the new passenger terminal, and was greeted with a customary festive water salute.
Al Maktoum International Airport's two other launch carriers are Kuwait-based low-cost carrier Jazeera Airways and Bahrain's full-service Gulf Air, which also made it's inaugural flight to the new airport on Sunday.
The UAE's state-owned carrier Emirates is expected to operate entirely out of the new hub by the time of completion.
[...]
sursa (http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/28/travel/dubai-new-airport/index.html?sr=fb102813worldbiggestairport930a)
Quote from: DanCld on October 20, 2013, 08:37:14 PM
Mai mult decat atat, conteaza prestigiu unui aeroport international(prestigiu de tara chiar!) daca Capitala e legata de un metrou cu OTP, sau de taximetristi flecmatici si care mai si fura la tarif...
Plus ca uitam de zonele populate din nordul Capitalei, zone care in ultimii 10 ani si-au triplat populatia...
Nu ca vreau sa dau un exemplu negativ dar aici in Irlanda (republica) niciunul dintre cele 3 aeroporturi internationale (DUB, SNN, ORK) nu e legat la vreo retea feroviara locala sau nationala. E blestemul economiilor emergente - nevoi multe, bani putini, ceva coruptie si am tras linie.
Quote from: DanCld on November 08, 2013, 09:13:34 PM
Nu ca vreau sa dau un exemplu negativ dar aici in Irlanda (republica) niciunul dintre cele 3 aeroporturi internationale (DUB, SNN, ORK) nu e legat la vreo retea feroviara locala sau nationala. E blestemul economiilor emergente - nevoi multe, bani putini, ceva coruptie si am tras linie.
Nici HEL, de exemplu. Si Finlanda numai economie emergenta nu e.
Din aeroporturi de marimea OTP, nici TLS (Toulouse), nici GLA (Glasgow), nici VCE (Venetia), nici EDI (Edinburgh), nici TFS, nici ALC (Alicante), nici NCE (Nisa).
De altfel, sunt extrem de putine aeroporturi care au infrastructura feroviara dezvoltata la <10 mpax (LYS, BHX si CGN imi vin in minte) - si, acestea au fost deservite de calea ferata ca future-proofing pe termen ultra-lung la constructia unei noi magistrale feroviare (la CGN in cadrul liniei noi de ICE, la LYS in cadrul liniei noi de TGV, la BHX pentru ca linia trecea fix prin fata aeroportului si chiar langa aeroport s-a construit un imens centru de expozitii care atrage extra-trafic).
Un aeroport cu 10 mpax/an genereaza in jur de 3000 pasageri/zi pentru fiecare directie. Inseamna 200-220 de pax/ora pe directie
cel mult - adica aproximativ un automotor pe ora sau 4 autobuze urbane/autocare pe ora. Peste este pur si simplu risipa.
Deci, la un aeroport de 10 mpax/an, intrebarile sunt:
Ce este mai confortabil pentru pasager? 1.
1 tren pe ora sau
2.
4-5 autobuze pe orarespectiv
Ce costa mai putin administratia aeroportului, statul si pana la capat pe pasager?1.
infrastructura feroviara, garile, trenurile sau
2.
cateva autobuze?
Raspunsul e simplu: 2. respectiv 2. Asa incat orice investitie intr-o infrastructura feroviara pentru un aeroport cu 7-10 mpax este aruncat de bani pe fereastra, si megalomanie absurda. Exceptie cand oricum trebuie sa trasezi o linie noua prin zona, si vrei sa "future proof" aeroportul pentru decenii.
Cand OTP va avea 15-20 mpax (si aici vorbim de cel devreme 2025 - chiar si cu o dezvoltare economica exploziva a Romaniei), atunci o gara e la locul ei (si, apropo, e in master-planul pentru OTP-2; si OTP pana acum s-a tinut cu sfintenie de masterplanul anterior).
Pana atunci, autobuze cu cap si taxiuri decente. Si ce naiba, poti asigura taxiuri decente foarte, foarte usor. La fel cum poti asigura autobuze/autocare de calitate (fie prin RATB, fie printr-un alt partener, fie prin mai multi parteneri). Orice altceva va incomoda si pasagerii si va fi si tocat bani degeaba.
Cat despre prestigiu,
m-am saturat de elefanti albi. Avem destui in Romania - Casa Poporului; a doua pista la OTP (de care n-a fost niciodata nevoie, cu atat mai putin in conditiile in care a fost construita cand OTP avea 200.000 pax trafic si 10 zboruri pe zi); Canalul Dunare-Marea Neagra si alte asemenea tampenii, le-a facut un nebun acum cateva decenii. Asta in conditiile in care n-avem (si n-aveam) autostrazi, cai ferate, apa in casa si drumuri de asfalt pana la orice casa.
Acum ne apucam de facut cai ferate de care n-are nimeni nevoie si metrouri care nu aduc nici un avantaj cand avem nevoie de metrouri in alte parti? Sau de cai ferate functionale in alte zone ale tarii? Sau de autostrazi? Sau de apa curenta? Doar pentru "prestigiu national"? Prestigiu national nu inseamna metrou la aeroport - inseamna badea Ion care are WC in casa, in fiecare casa, si asfalt pe ulita, pe fiecare ulita.
Avem nevoie de MULTA infrastructura in Romania. Care trebuie sa fie dimensionata exact atat cat este necesar. Nu mai mult, nu mai putin.
totusi, cat de greu ar fi sa lege aeroportul de calea ferata care se afla acum la 1 km de aeroport?
nu tb un metrou nou (desi poate zona de nord ar atrage multi calatori cu un parc&ride la otopeni), momentan ar fi de ajuns sa construiasca doar o gara .
linia merge destul de drept si probabil ca ar face 30 de minute pana la gara de nord .
asa cum este acum nu prea are nici un sens: autobuz pana la gara - tren de acolo. de obicei oamenii mai au si bagaje.
sau ar putea ca unul din autobuze sa plece dintr-o autogara (de ex ar putea amenaja la gara de nord o statie doar pt autobuzul pt otopeni). nimanui nu-i prea arde sa stea afara si sa astepte autobuzul de otopeni.
Many flights delayed at UK airportsQuoteFlights are being delayed across the UK and in the Irish Republic because of an air traffic control centre fault.
Affected airports include Heathrow, Stansted, Cardiff, Dublin, and Glasgow.
The National Air Traffic Control Service (Nats) said its Swanwick centre, in Hampshire, was having "difficulty switching from night time to daytime operation".
Operations director Juliet Kennedy said: "We don't at the moment know how long it is going to take to resolve."
Ms Kennedy said the problem is capacity, as the control centre is still running a reduced night time service.
She said: "We just can't manage as many flights as normal," adding that it is up to individual airlines to prioritise who goes where.
[...]
sursa: BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25278163)
Stie cineva care mai este stadiul Aeroportului Berlin Brandenburg si cam cand o sa-l inaugureze?
Dublin Airport
Ireland's biggest airport operator has applauded the government's decision to scrap its air travel tax from April next year. The Irish Government has moved to remove the €3 air travel tax, which had been blamed for negatively impacting both outbound and inbound travel in the republic. The DAA, which operates Dublin and Cork airports, said it was a welcome move for the air travel industry in the country.
Manchester Airport
Chinese investors will pump millions of pounds into the £800 million development of Manchester's Airport City, which is hoped will strengthen business links between Britain and the world's second largest economy. Beijing Construction Engineering Group (BCEG) has agreed a joint venture with Manchester Airports Group (MAG), UK construction group Carillion, and the Greater Manchester Pension Fund on the development which is expected to create around 16,000 new jobs and attract international businesses.
Bristol Airport
Work has started on a £6.5 million walkway at Bristol Airport to enhance the passenger experience and ease departure lounge congestion at peak times. Once completed, the central walkway will feature four new pre-boarding zones serving up to six departure gates. The 3,880sqm structure will connect directly to the departure lounge.
Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport
Paris-CDG has opened an additional 1,200sqm of retail space dedicated to beauty care and French lifestyle. The new additions come in the form of two new BuY PARIS DUTY FREE multi-brand stores offering perfumes, cosmetics, wines & spirits, tobacco products and fine foods. The gateway now boasts 72 BuY PARIS DUTY FREE retail outlets.
Berlin Brandenburg
International Airport Berlin's new €2.5 billion airport is a step closer to becoming reality after Siemens signed a contract for the reconstruction of the smoke ventilation control system that delayed its opening. According to Berlin Brandenburg International Airport, the work is necessary as some of the parts in the existing smoke ventilation control system – built by various third-party contractors – had "proved unworkable" in tests.
Göteborg-Landvetter Airport
Travellers can now purchase 'printon- demand' reading material through an eco-friendly service at Göteborg Landvetter Airport in Sweden. Swedavia, which runs the Swedish airport, says it is the first to offer the initiative, which will be located at its newsstand kiosk Meganews Magazines. Passengers can choose from more than a hundred publications from periodical to print titles and pay the same price as in a regular shop using their credit card.
Helsinki Airport
Finavia Corporation, the company responsible for Finland's airports and air navigation services, is starting a major development programme at Helsinki Airport. Finavia will advance with two separate investment programmes totalling some €300 million between now and 2020. The aim is to ensure that Helsinki Airport will be able to maintain its strong competitive position in transit traffic between Europe and Asia.
St. Petersburg Pulkovo Airport
The €700 million development of new terminal facilities at St Petersburg Pulkovo Airport will set a 'benchmark' for construction in the industry. Phase one of the terminal revamp at Pulkovo, which serves Russia's second biggest city and is the nation's self-proclaimed 'gateway in the east', is set to welcome its first passengers on 4 December. A number of new facilities have been built as part of the first phase, including the main building of the new central passenger terminal and North Pier.
Kharkiv Airport
The arrival of a brand new homebased carrier, the commencement of scheduled flights from Central and Eastern European low-cost carrier Wizz Air, and the imminent opening of a new cargo terminal, mean 2013 will be remembered for the right reasons. And, there is further network growth on the cards, including new direct links to Asia and Europe – markets that are currently heavily served via one-stop flights.
Liege Airport
This year's FIATA World Congress & Air Cargo Logistics Conference took place in Singapore in mid-October. The 2nd 'Payload Asia Awards' took place at the event and Liege Airport beat off competition from Singapore's Changi Airport and Atlanta's International Airport among others. Liege won for its full commitment to cargo, operational cargo performance, customer service and a competitive costs and services model.
Istanbul Airport
Oslo-based architecture firm Nordic Office of Architecture has won the right to design Istanbul's new airport. The Norwegian architect joined forces with British firm Grimshaw to beat eight other contenders to design what is expected to be the world's largest airport. The new airport will be designed to accommodate 90mppa and 150mppa within 10 years, and have three runways. The airport is scheduled for completion by 2017
Source (http://www.airport-business.com/2013/11/airports-in-the-news-10/#sthash.T8U6Q6KX.dpuf)
Spania. Aeroport ultramodern de un miliard de euro vândut cu 100 de milioane de euroQuoteUn aeroport ultramodern, în care proprietarii au investit un miliard de euro, este scos astăzi la licitație pentru 100 de milioane de euro.
În anii în care economia Spaniei creștea cu procente ce depășeau 10% pe an, autoritățile din Castilia la Mancha au construit un aeroport ultramodern aflat la doar 225 de km de Madrid, unde aterizează și decolează zilnic sute de avioane.
Nimeni nu s-a gândit atunci ce atractivitate ar putea avea un aeroport aflat la doar 15 minute de zbor de capitala Spaniei.
Aeroportul din Ciudad Real are una dintre cele mai lungi piste din Europa fiind capabil să primească fără probleme și celebrele Airbus A380.
De la inaugurarea din 2009 puține avioane au aterizat pe acest aeroport. Au fost vremuri cu trei curse saptămânale și acelea având bilete subvenționate de autoritățile locale, a transmis Ciprian Bălțoiu, corespondentul Digi24 la Madrid.
Din păcate situația de la Ciudad Real nu este unică pentru Spania. În Llerida, nordul Cataloniei există un aeroport, construit cu 100 de milioane de euro, pe care aterizează săptămânal doar 2 avioane.
Iar la Castellon, un alt aeroport de sute de milioane de euro a fost inaugurat cu mare fast însă imediat după aceea s-a constatat faptul că pista a fost proiectată greșit astfel încat este imposibilă aterizarea vreunui avion.
sursa (http://www.digi24.ro/Stiri/Digi24/Extern/Europa/Spania+Aeroport+ultramodern+de+un+miliard+de+euro+vandut+cu+100+)
In cazul in care vreti sa aterizati pe aeroportul lui Mos Craciun de la Polul Nord aveti nevoie de o harta. Indicatiile aeroportului sunt disponibile :lol:
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Ley5-XdWbXw/UqmK2O3U77I/AAAAAAAASTU/hVYKq5YrE1g/s1600/1470318_622908871077991_294964239_n.jpg)
Quote from: DanCld on October 20, 2013, 08:37:14 PM
Calculasem la un moment dat pe metroousor numarul de pasageri/ora pe care se poate baza un sistem de transport intre Bucuresti si OTP (pornind de la milioanele de pasageri care trec anual prin aeroport); din cate tin minte a rezultat un numar relativ mic, usor de acoperit doar cu autobuze relativ frecvente - ceea ce avem deja. Dar privind in viitor cu siguranta ca e nevoie de conectarea aeroportului la A3 si la reteaua feroviara nationala.
"Reteaua feroviara nationala" se afla intr-o situatie dificila, daca nu precara: material rulant depasit, cai ferate care permit o viteza de deplasare mica, in parte gari care arata ca dupa 1945, etc.. E ca si cand ai adauga la garile Halta Depoul Bucuresti, Balotesti, Caciulati, etc. gara OTP!
Dupa cum am mai scris, ideea unei linii metrou(M6) care sa uneasca OTP de centrul Bucurestiului nu este noua si a fost reactivata la initiativa unor grupuri de specialisti si institutii din Japonia, plus fortata de situatia specifica zonei(taxi-uri controlate de un fel de mafie, autobuze 'speciale' pentru care cumparatul de bilete e o aventura(!), de cresterea rapida a numarului de calatori pe OTP, de dezvoltarea vertiginoasa a zonei urbane din jurul aeroportului, etc.). Comparam cu ce este normal pentru un oras cu peste doua milioane locuitori, (capitala)intr-o tara din UE si nu cu aeroporturi regionale....
De aceea ideea unirii OTP de Bucuresti printr-o magistrala de metrou ramane ideea cea mai acceptabila.
In legatura cu A3:
a existat un proiect care prevedea legatura OTP de aceasta autostrada, dar nimeni nu mai stie ceva...
Quote from: Goldmund on December 28, 2013, 03:03:01 PM
In legatura cu A3:
a existat un proiect care prevedea legatura OTP de aceasta autostrada, dar nimeni nu mai stie ceva...
Acel proiect exista. Face parte din strategia pe termen lung a dezvoltarii OTP. Acea legatura va fi facuta in cadrul proiectului de extindere al OTP, n-are treaba cu A3 in sine. Tine de aeroport. Si se va face... pentru ca in extindere vor sa faca un nou terminal (de data asta pe bune, un terminal separat, nu tip finger/extindere) in est si va fi nevoie de acces in/dinspre A3. Bine, depinde cand se vor apuca de extindere...
Quote from: Goldmund on December 28, 2013, 03:03:01 PM
"Reteaua feroviara nationala" se afla intr-o situatie dificila, daca nu precara: material rulant depasit, cai ferate care permit o viteza de deplasare mica, in parte gari care arata ca dupa 1945, etc.. E ca si cand ai adauga la garile Halta Depoul Bucuresti, Balotesti, Caciulati, etc. gara OTP!
Cu 20.000.000 EUR se aduce toata linia Balotesti - Gara de Nord la standard de 120 km/h (nu e nevoie de mai mult, distantele sunt mici, intre 120 si 160 ar fi o diferenta de sub 1 minut pana la Gara de Nord). Cu inca 5 milioane de Euro se construieste o gara supraterana decenta, si cu 3-4 milioane de EUR un tunel cu benzi rulante (ca la Frankfurt) intre gara si aeroport. Transportul s-ar face cu Desiro, care asigura mix-ul de capacitate perfect. Plus ca exista desirouri cate vrei la CFR.
Quote from: Goldmund on December 28, 2013, 03:03:01 PM
Dupa cum am mai scris, ideea unei linii metrou(M6) care sa uneasca OTP de centrul Bucurestiului nu este noua si a fost reactivata la initiativa unor grupuri de specialisti si institutii din Japonia
Nu. A fost reactivata de Videanu prin masterplanul din 2005/6, nu de japonezi. La japonezi s-a ajuns in felul urmator:
- japonezii, prin JICA si JBIC au fost dispusi sa ofere aproximativ 400 milioane de USD credit pentru reabilitarea si constructia metroului prin programul ODA.
- PMB impreuna cu reprezentanti ai Guvernului Romaniei au spus ca exista finantare pentru restul proiectelor de metrou din masterplanul original JICA si din masterplanul revizuit din 2005/6 (adevarat, dat fiind ca toate proiectele din respectivul masterplan sunt ori in uz ori in constructie acum).
- pana la urma s-a semnat un contract cu japonezii, disponibil aici :
http://www.dsclex.ro/legislatie/2010/decembrie2010/mo2010_814.htm.
Este
unul din cele mai rele contracte posibile pentru partea romana. Dobanda e de
1.70% pe an la yeni japonezi. Stii cat e dobanda la un credit ipotecar (dat unei persoane fizice) in Japonia? 1.6%. Deci un cetatean normal din Japonia, care vrea sa-si ia casa, cu un salariu modest, plateste mai putin la banca lunar ca statul roman la un credit "preferential" dat ca "ajutor de dezvoltare": http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2013/06/01/boj-beat-mortgage-rates-rise-despite-boj-bazooka/.
Statul roman s-ar imprumuta la 0.7-0.8% la yeni daca ar emite bonduri (interbank-ul anual e 0.35-0.4), deci ar iesi mai ieftin decat cu "minunea JICA".
Surpriza, insa. Pentru lucrari de consultanta, dobanda e de...
0.01%. Japonezi-japonezi, dar stiu si ei sa-si faca treaba in stil balcanic. Ca doar lucreaza si ei prin Filipine si Indonezia si Kazahtan si Georgia si au auzit de "si gura mea tre' sa manance".
Ca sa fie si mai clar, consultanta e asigurata 100% din fonduri JICA, constructia, in conditiile oneroase de mai sus, doar 33% dintr-o valoare subestimata, astfel incat sa fie clar ca statul roman nu se va apuca de constructie. Astfel incat JICA stie sigur la ce vor fi folositi banii din imprumut - consultanta care sa spuna ca nu-i o idee buna. Consultanta facuta cu o firma japoneza in colaborare cu JICA. PADECO ii spune firmei daca n-aveti idee.
Concluzie: imprumutul a fost un fel de para-indarat JICA - JICA via statul roman. Statul roman o sa plateasca niste hartii facute foarte probabil pe genunchi (daca nu ma credeti ce treaba buna face JICA si PADECO - specializat pe tari de lumea a III-a, cautati studiul/master-planul din 1999, si numarati greselile de formulare si de ortografie pe pagina; ca sa nu mai vorbim de erori de continut; pare un referat facut de elevi).
P.S. Ghici ce spune studiul PADECO? 40.000 pax/zi pentru M6, insuficient pentru a justifica un metrou : http://www.mediafax.ro/economic/ponta-considera-ca-linia-de-metrou-spre-aeroportul-henri-coanda-otopeni-ar-fi-ineficienta-economic-11646352.
40.000 am cam numarat si noi pe-aici sau pe SSC : 6.000 generati de OTP, 4-5.000 generati de Baneasa Shopping Center si environ., in jur de 10.000 generati de Piata Presei, Romexpo, Herastrau si terminalul multimodal, si maximum 2500 pax pe statie pentru restul statiilor.
2222 pax/ora medie pentru toata magistrala. La 12 trenuri pe ora (1 tren pe directie la fiecare 10 minute) inseamna 185 pasageri pe tren in medie. Va circula la cam
9% din capacitatea liniei. Incasarile n-au cum sa acopere cheltuielile de operare, dat fiind ca nici liniile care merg la 60-70% din capacitate nu au cum sa-si acopere incasarile. Va rezulta un mamut, elefant alb, Casa Poporului in varianta subterana vesnic subventionat. Sau poate admirati Casa Poporului....
Bun pana aici cu japonezii?
Quote from: Goldmund on December 28, 2013, 03:03:01 PM
plus fortata de situatia specifica zonei(taxi-uri controlate de un fel de mafie, autobuze 'speciale' pentru care cumparatul de bilete e o aventura(!), de cresterea rapida a numarului de calatori pe OTP, de dezvoltarea vertiginoasa a zonei urbane din jurul aeroportului, etc.).
Fac o mica comparatie: trebuie sa batem un cui. Pentru ca ciocanul are manerul un pic rupt, solutia e sa folosim un buldozer? Cam asta e solutia dv. la problema, propunand metrou.
E nevoie de o capacitate de transport x cu x estimat undeva intre 3.000 si 7.000 pax/zi. Pentru ca mixul modal are mici probleme, introducem un sistem cu o capacitate x la de 20 ori cererea estimata? 783-ul si 780-ul circula semi-goale, de unde naiba sa umplem metrouri.
Taxiurile
aveau probleme. Ok, se monteaza un dispecerat si niste automate plus niste panouri de informare. Gata! S-a rezolvat problema. Intamplator s-au montat panourile, s-au pus automatele si s-a facut si dispeceratul. Solutia pe Otopeni e mai civilizata si mai eleganta ca la Stockholm, de exemplu (unde e plin de taximetristi tepari).
E greu de gasit bilet la RATB? Montam dracului 5 masinarii de bilete. Mai bine, angajam 5 persoane care sa vorbeasca 5 limbi straine sa vanda bilete la RATB pe peste tot. 5 masinarii de bilete x 10.000 EUR/masinarie = 50.000 EUR.
50.000 EUR in infrastructura e MULT mai ieftin ca 1.000.000.000 EUR, cat ar costa metroul. Fara sa aduca nimic in plus.
Quote from: Goldmund on December 28, 2013, 03:03:01 PM
cresterea rapida a numarului de calatori pe OTP
....
Comparam cu ce este normal pentru un oras cu peste doua milioane locuitori, (capitala)intr-o tara din UE si nu cu aeroporturi regionale....
De aceea ideea unirii OTP de Bucuresti printr-o magistrala de metrou ramane ideea cea mai acceptabila.
Ba fix cu aeroporturi regionale din Europa de Vest ne comparam. Din ratiuni economice - un salariu middle-class in Bucuresti e undeva la 650 EUR, fata de 1500 in Italia sau Spania si 2000+ in Germania. Activitatea economica si de business este la fel, tot pe-acolo. Si salariile in Romania vor ajunge la niveluri de Polonia probabil in 5-10 ani si la niveluri de Germania in cel putin 25-30 de ani, daca vor ajunge vreodata.
Asta face ca cererea sa fie mult mai scazuta/cap de locuitor - oferta de pret si costul pe scaun sunt o marfa destul de inelastica, tot atat te costa sa duci un A320 intre OTP si MUC cat te costa sa zbori ARN - MUC. Asa ca numarul de pax/capita este mult mai mic, rezultand in aeroporturi mai mici.
De altfel, cererea de zbor este mult pestea cea modelata de diverse modele matematice - am vazut studiu care estima o suprautilizare de 2 milioane fata de potentialul curent calculat pt. BUH.
Deci, de care crestere rapida vorbim? Aproape tot saltul din 2012 a fost mutarea curselor de pe Baneasa.
Traficul aero pentru toata zona BUH a fost cu 1.33% mai mare in 2012 ca in 2011 (7547465 fata de 7448354). Anul asta, estimarile jan-nov sunt de 5.2% crestere fata de 2012. Nici anii trecuti n-au fost spectaculosi : 2008/9: -5.09%, 2009/10: 3.54%, 2010/11 fiind singurul cu crestere peste 10% pe BUH (11.4%).
Scenarii:
+++: La 10% crestere anuala ar fi 15.58 milioane de pax/an in 2020. Dat fiind ca nu mai are cine sa intre pe piata in afara de Ryanair si Easyjet ca firme mari, cu potential de baza pe OTP, nu vad cum s-ar putea inregistra cresteri de 10% pe an. Doar sa intre ME3 masiv impreuna cu Ryanair SI Easyjet (baza + baza) plus dezvoltare masiva a Tarom. <1% sanse.
++: La 5% crestere vom avea 11.26 milioane pax/an in 2020. Sunt putine sanse ca OTP sa mentina 5% crestere - 2-3% sunt estimarile aeroportului. Doar o baza Ryanair sau Easyjet (putin probabile) ar putea schimba lucrurile. 5% sanse.
+: La o crestere care se atenueaza pornind de la 6% si coborand anual cu 0.5 p.p ajungem la 10.88 milioane de pax anual. 35% sanse.
B: La o crestere de 2.98% pe an (media 2008 - 2013, cu estimarea optimista de 8 pentru anul asta) ajungem la 9.82 milioane de pax in 2020. 35% sanse.
-: Daca pica TAROM-ul a la Malev, ma astept la stagnare, a la BUD, maximum 8 milioane pax/an in 2020. 20% sanse.
--: Stagflatie + criza politica + caderea TAROM + limite la emigrare puse prin reforme UE : 6-6.5 milioane pax . :<5% sanse.
Bun. 30% din astia aleg sa mearga cu transportul in comun,
semnificativ peste media in lume (14%) si un nivel considerat aspirational de majoritatea aeroporturilor. Astea ar fi maximum - maximorum, imposibil de atins in mod normal.:
30% mix modal transport public
+++: 12.805 pax/zi + 1500 (2*750) angajati, vizitatori etc. = 14.305 (Pr < 1%) = 894/ora (16 ore)
++: 9.254 pax/zi + 1100 (2*550) angajati, vizitatori etc. = 10.354 (Pr = 5%) = 647/ora (16 ore)
+: 8.942 pax/zi + 1000 (2*500) angajati, vizitatori etc. = 9.942 (Pr =35%) = 621/ora (16 ore)
B: 8.071 pax/zi + 900 (2*450) angajati, vizitatori etc. = 8.971 (Pr =35%) = 504/ora (16 ore)
-: 6.575 pax/zi + 900 (2*450) angajati, vizitatori etc. = 7.575 (Pr =25%) = 541/ora (14 ore)
--: 4.931 pax/zi + 800 (2*400) angajati, vizitatori etc. = 5.731 (Pr = 5%) = 409/ora (14 ore)
UN tren de metrou poate duce fix 1200 pasageri in conditii standard de confort. Tineti minte ca cifrele de mai sus, chiar in situatia ideala in care am putea transporta 30% din pasagerii de pe OTP cu transport public, sunt pentru ambele directii (sosiri si plecari).
Deci la un tren pe ora / directie, ar fi, chiar si in situatia +++ (aia careia eu ii dau <1% sanse), trenul doar
O TREIME plin. Si vorbim de un tren pe ora. Cati ati prefera sa asteptati o ora dupa tren? La situatia + trenul ar fi sub
UN SFERT plin, tot un tren pe ora!
La 2 trenuri pe ora, 16.67% plin in situatia +++ si doar 12% plin in situatia +! Practic perfect gol.
Mult mai probabil e un mix modal de 15% transport public dat fiind relatia invers proportionala intre distanta si alegerea mijloacelor publice ca solutie de a ajunge la aeroport (de ce? daca taxiul e ieftin / benzina consumata si timpul consumat e putin, e mai avantajos sa iei un taxi sau sa conduci la aeroport, fie ca ai bagaje, fie ca te grabesti intr-o calatorie de afaceri).
La 15%, ajungem la:
+++:447 pax/ora - adica 6 autobuze pe directie pe ora
++: 324 pax/ora - adica 5 autobuze pe directie pe ora
+: 311 pax/ora - adica 5 autobuze pe directie pe ora
B: 252 pax/ora - adica 4-5 autobuze pe directie pe ora
-: 271 pax/ora - adica 4 autobuze pe directie pe ora
--: 205 pax/ora - adica 3 autobuze pe directie pe ora
RATB ofera
azi pana la 7 autobuze/directie pe ora la ora de varf, pentru o medie de 4 plecari pe directie pe ora (incluzand intervalul de noapte) sau 4.35/directie/ora doar pentru 5:00-24:00.
Adica ofera, in clipa asta, transport adecvat pentru utilizarea curenta a aeroportului. Ca nu pare sincronizat cu bancurile de plecari sosiri, asta e o alta mancare de peste. Dar se rezolva cu dispecerizare, niste telefoane, niste "saru-mainile" si atat. Cost total : vreo 20 EUR (faxuri, telefoane, cafele si 1-2 ore de munca). Mult mai putin decat 1.000.000.000 EUR in tunele.
Si autobuz la FIECARE 10 minute, ori spre gara, ori spre centru? Sau metrou odata pe ora? Ce aleg? Autobuzul!
Nu inteleg grandoarea degeaba!
Quote
In legatura cu A3:
a existat un proiect care prevedea legatura OTP de aceasta autostrada, dar nimeni nu mai stie ceva...
E parte a proiectului de extindere facut de Hochtief : http://www.bucharestairports.ro/admin/kcfinder/upload/files/Raport%20de%20Mediu%20(2).pdf.
Sunt probleme cu respectivul plan:
Desi tot traficul de pe BBU a fost mutat deja pe OTP (lucru care, cf. planului trebuia sa aiba loc in 2018), cifrele de trafic sunt mult sub cele provizionate si prevazute pentru OTP singur (OTP, in 2013, cf. planului Hochtief, era estimat sa aiba 9 milioane de pax + 2.5 la BBU; in realitate, toata zona BUH va avea sub 8 in 2013, o pierdere de 3.5 milioane de pax).
Ratele de crestere calculate sunt si ele sub asteptari. Planul a fost construit pe "irrational exuberance" din 2008, cu previziuni de 27 milioane in 2025, pe care nimeni, dar absolut nimeni nu le mai crede. Acum oamenii isi calculeaza ratele de crestere cu 2-3% cresteri, si in loc sa refuze linii se roaga pentru inca o frecventa.
- prin urmare, Optiunea 4, cea adoptata formal si oficial a picat in practica. Optiunea 4 prevedea 18 milioane de pax procesati in 2019, cu o capacitate de 28 milioane la finalizarea etapei II.
Azi trebuia sa avem deja doua terminale (cel curent, in forma extinsa/actuala + primul modul din OTP-2) astfel incat sa fie loc pentru preluarea traficului de pe BBU. Dar... n-a fost nevoie, s-ar fi construit primul modul ca sa suiere vantul prin el. Si s-a preluat TOT traficul de pe BBU intr-o singura miscare.
Ce se va intampla mai departe Dumnezeu stie. Dat fiind cresterile curente, optiunea 1 suna din ce in ce mai tentant - pastrarea amplasamentului actual, extinderea si integrarea modulelor curente pana la o capacitate de 20 mPax.
frunzaverde,
imi este greu a gasi timpul necesar pentru a te urmari..., dar apreciez sincer efortul tau prin care incerci sa demonstrezi ca un oras precum Stuttgart merita un tren suburban de mare capacitate(S-Bahn), plus un metrou(usor - v. proiectul U6 pana la aeroport), plus un tren de mare viteza(v. proiectul S21) pentru a uni orasul cu 580mii locuitori de aeroportul international Stuttgart(STR) care mai mult de 10-12 milioane calatori nu o sa aiba niciodata..., in acelasi timp demonstrezi ca o capitala de tara UE, de fapt o metropola cu peste 2 milioane locuitori va lasa locul Belgradului sau Sofiei pentru a deveni un aeroport regional in locul Bucurestiului...Pentru ca de fapt asta inseamna daca OTP il tratam ca pe un aeroport regional din liga a doua si ne chinuim sa dovedim ca nu merita sa fie dezvoltat masiv, ca nu merita unit cu o magistrala metrou de marele oras, ca infrastructura transportului in comun (a orasului Bucuresti)ar trebui sa ramana dezvoltata doar intre granitele orasului trasate in urma cu 50 de ani.... Pentru ca asta inseamna.
Am dat exemplul STR pentru ca e oarecum apropiat de capacitatea actuala a OTP(si sa nu uitam ca STR are doar la 200km un aeroport de talia unui MUC, cu apropae 40 milioane calatori/an!) si care nu poate deveni niciodata un aeroport cu o importanta peste regiunea din care face parte...Am mai scris ca trenurile S-Bahnului care face legatura cu aeroportul se succed la 15 minute, sunt mai mult goale, dar aduc o stea in plus la STR!
Cel putin pentru calatorii germani, toate aeroporturile din lume sunt descrise sumar prin cateva date importante:
pe primul loc se afla infrastructura:
-autostrazi
-distanta pana in centrul orasului
-numar calatori/an
-pe locul patru vin datele despre transportul in comun care deservesc aeroportul Aceste date sunt foarte importante pentru alegerea unei destinatii, pentru a reveni acolo, etc..
Ar mai fi un motiv pentru care cred ca M6 va fi un succes pentru regiune:
Romania nu are inca nici un oras cu un transport in comun modern suburban(nici un S Bahn), de aceea singura posibilitate a Bucurestiului este si ramane pentru multa vreme metroul care ar trebui extins si in afara granitelor capitalei.(Mogosoaia, Otopeni, Voluntari)
PS
Numarul de calatori care ar alege metroul este foarte relativ de estimat:
daca OTP va fi lasat pe mana taximetristilor locali si a unor autobuze-fantoma, majoritatea calatorilor de pe OTP va alege desigur dupa posibilitati, automobilul. Chiar si firmele straine se straduiesc sa-si transporte oamenii cu masinile proprii...Turistii aleg volens-nolens autobuzele sau taxiurile, dar apeleaza foarte des la rude, cunoscuti, prieteni.
Daca M6 ar avea statie sub aeroport, majoritatea ar alege cu siguranta transportul in comun , inclusiv lucratorii de pe OTP
Quote from: Goldmund on December 29, 2013, 12:20:44 PM
frunzaverde,
imi este greu a gasi timpul necesar pentru a te urmari..., dar apreciez sincer efortul tau prin care incerci sa demonstrezi ca un oras precum Stuttgart merita un tren suburban de mare capacitate(S-Bahn), plus un metrou(usor - v. proiectul U6 pana la aeroport), plus un tren de mare viteza(v. proiectul S21) pentru a uni orasul cu 580mii locuitori de aeroportul international Stuttgart(STR) care mai mult de 10-12 milioane calatori nu o sa aiba niciodata...
Am dat exemplul STR pentru ca e oarecum apropiat de capacitatea actuala a OTP(si sa nu uitam ca STR are doar la 200km un aeroport de talia unui MUC, cu apropae 40 milioane calatori/an!) si care nu poate deveni niciodata un aeroport cu o importanta peste regiunea din care face parte...Am mai scris ca trenurile S-Bahnului care face legatura cu aeroportul se succed la 15 minute, sunt mai mult goale, dar aduc o stea in plus la STR!
STR e conectat la oras printr-o
linie CF conventionala, pe care circula trenuri regionale de naveta, care NU DESERVESC DOAR AEROPORTUL. Atat. Trenurile alea servesc in principal orasele interconectate din zona STR, si, intamplator, servesc
SI aeroportul. Pe scurt:
1. Un sistem S-Bahn are o capacitate
mult mai mica decat un sistem tip metrou (~40% din cel oferit de o retea de metrou).
2. Extensia de S-Bahn spre aeroportul din STR nu serveste doar aeroportul cat si complexul expozitional si 2 suburbii extrem de populate (Echterdingen si Filderstadt), in total ~100.000 de locuitori. Plus unul din cele mai mari complexe complexe expozitionale din DE.
3. Extensia de S-Bahn are
6.5 km din care 3 la suprafata. Deci, 100.000 de locuitori serviti cu 6.5 km de TREN. Intamplator trenul trece si pe la aeroport, de unde mai ia pasageri.
4. S21 este o megalomanie ridicola, alaturi de aeroportul din Berlin (aveam bilet via ARN -
BER - FCO cu Lufthansa in IUNIE 2012; nu e deschis nici astazi); nu e un exemplu de planificare germana de calitate - e exemplul tipic de "asa nu". S-a ales legarea la aeroport doar pentru future-proofing-ul liniei ferate, nu pentru ca ar fi nevoie de trafic. Eu unul
nu cred ca S21 va fi construit, nu in forma curenta cel putin. De altfel, e foarte posibil ca gara de la aeroport sa fie prima "stearsa", dat fiind ca proiectul e mult peste buget.
5. U6 e
tramvai, nu metrou. Capacitatea unui tren pe U6 va fi mai mica decat a unui V3A din Bucuresti. Extensia pleaca din Fasanenhof (8000 de locuitori) si are
1500 m, toti supraterani, toti la standard de tramvai. Si U6 e vazut ca rafuiala politica intre autoritati, ca contrapondere la S21, o adevarata balacareala.
STR
nu e exemplu bun in planificare de transport. Cum BER nu e exemplu bun in cum sa construiesti un aeroport.
Dar, in concluzie, chiar si cu proasta planificare a retelei,
in STR aeroportul este doar un punct de deservire intre alte suburbii mari, compacte, care salveaza traficul.
P.S. Parca locuiai in DE, chiar in zona STR. Atunci, n-ai cum sa nu stii care a fost povestea cu STR - la mijlocul anilor '80, Lufthansa vroia sa-si faca al doilea hub, in sudul Germaniei, pentru a prelucra pasageri din Bavaria, Elvetia si nordul bogat al Italiei, in concurenta cu Swiss si Alitalia.
Aeroportul de azi din Muenchen nu exista. Exista Riem, care era cam cat STR (10 milioane). Stuttgart si Muenchen au fost contracandidate pana in ultimul moment; linia de S-Bahn si locatia Messe au fost alese ca incentive pentru ca LH sa aleaga STR in detrimentul MUC.
LH a ales MUC, pe motiv de constructie noua, eliberarea tarilor ex-comuniste (LH a vazut repede potential in CZ, PL si HU) si trafic O/D mai mare. Daca zidul Berlinului mai statea 2-3 ani, foarte posibil sa fi fost STR aeroportul cu 40 de milioane de pasageri, si MUC aeroportul cu 9.
Dar hai sa vedem diferenta fata de OTPIn Bucuresti, OTP e
unica relatie de trafic existenta pe ruta propusa, Otopeniul este un biet Fasanenhof, si e singur-singurel ca suburbie. "Nordul" (Pajura - Baneasa - Otopeni) au densitatile cele mai mici din oras (150-200/mp), si sunt zone protejate, greu de modificat. Si tu propui metrou, acolo unde STR construieste tramvai (si unde, in STR, exista inca si mai multe suburbii care sa genereze si absoarba trafic)!
Propun o solutie asemanatoare cu cea de la STR curenta - TREN pana la aeroport, cu gara supraterana la aeroport. Nu S-Bahn, Bucurestiul nu are nici macar o suburbie capabila de a genera trafic de tip S-Bahn/S-Tog/Cercania/Pendeltåg etc., nici macar UNA, ci un tren dedicat de aeroport. Cu capacitate adecvata servirii exclusiv aeroportului, si cu frecvente asisderea. Plus trenuri long-distance. Dar asta doar cand aeroportul va genera suficient trafic
Quote from: Goldmund on December 29, 2013, 12:20:44 PM
in acelasi timp demonstrezi ca o capitala de tara UE, de fapt o metropola cu peste 2 milioane locuitori va lasa locul Belgradului sau Sofiei pentru a deveni un aeroport regional in locul Bucurestiului...Pentru ca de fapt asta inseamna daca OTP il tratam ca pe un aeroport regional din liga a doua si ne chinuim sa dovedim ca nu merita sa fie dezvoltat masiv, ca nu merita unit cu o magistrala metrou de marele oras, ca infrastructura transportului in comun (a orasului Bucuresti)ar trebui sa ramana dezvoltata doar intre granitele orasului trasate in urma cu 50 de ani.... Pentru ca asta inseamna.
Hub regional? Europa de est
NU ARE HUBURI REGIONALE, huburile regionale ale Europei de Est sunt VIE (Viena), IST (Istanbul), MUC (Muenchen), FRA (Frankfurt), CDG (Paris) si AMS (Amsterdam) (si intr-o mica masura SVO si LHR).
Toate aeroporturile din Europa Centrala si de Est sunt aeroporturi O/D de tip "gara terminus", cel mult cu tranzit extern-intern. Orice incercare a vreunui aeroport sa organizeze hub-uri regionale (si WAW, si BUD, si PRG au incercat) au esuat lamentabil.
Asa incat OTP
nu e la concurenta cu BUD sau cu SOF sau cu BEG pentru simplul motiv ca nu concureaza pe nimic, fiecare isi are pasagerii lui independenti.
Quote from: Goldmund on December 29, 2013, 12:20:44 PM
Cel putin pentru calatorii germani, toate aeroporturile din lume sunt descrise sumar prin cateva date importante:
pe primul loc se afla infrastructura:
-autostrazi
-distanta pana in centrul orasului
-numar calatori/an
-pe locul patru vin datele despre transportul in comun care deservesc aeroportul Aceste date sunt foarte importante pentru alegerea unei destinatii, pentru a reveni acolo, etc..
Intamplator, aeroporturile sunt descrise in presa de specialitate (nu in cine-stie-ce Wikipedia) cu alte date, gen PCN, capacitate de procesare pasageri, taxe aeroportuare etc. etc.. Accesul este important, bineinteles, dar rareori make-or-break.
Si sa ajungem la capitolul
TAXE. Cine plateste nebunia de 1 miliard de EUR? Studiul de fezabilitate imi spune 50.000 pasageri pe zi pe toata magistrala, adica
136 de ani pentru a se recupera doar costurile de constructie (nu si cele de operare (cum operarea M6 in profit va necesita minimum 100 mii de pax/zi, va merge si operational in pierdere pe veci). Un fel de canal Dunare - Marea Neagra.
Pai sunt trei alternative:
1. plateste CNAB. Asta inseamna cresterea taxelor si tarifelor aeroportuare. Asta inseamna:
- 1. OTP va avea tarife mult peste oricare alt aeroport;
- 2. OTP nu va avea fonduri de dezvoltare acolo unde are nevoie pentru a genera profit;
- 3. OTP va pierde companii aeriene, nu va mai putea atrage altele, si atunci OTP, Bucurestiul si TOATA lumea va pierde.
Si cand FRA - OTP va costa 100 EUR one-way si FRA - SOF va costa 50, din cauza ca OTP trebuie sa finanteze o magistrala de metrou nefolosita de nimeni, atunci nu-ti mai vin nici investitorii si nici turistii. Pentru ca nici dracu nu alege urmatoarea tara de vizitat dupa ce mijloc de transport se foloseste de la gara la aeroport si v.v., dar FOARTE multi (si turisti si investitori, inclusiv mari) iau in calcul costul de transport, durata si optiunile de transport aerian din punctul lor de origine (FRA, NYC sau AMS) pana la OTP.
De turisti ce sa mai vorbim, toata piata e low-yield, exista si sunt foarte populare (mai ales in Germania, intamplator) motoare de cautare 'surprinde-ma', unde destinatia e incerta, pretul fiind cel cert. Si daca turistii vor vedea 200 EUR pentru OTP din care 70 EUR taxa ca sa acopere megalomania... well, se vor duce altundeva, unde-i costa 30 EUR biletul.
2. plateste Statul. Ce-alegi?
M6 sau
Centura Bucuresti?
M6 sau
Autostrada Bucuresti - Bacau? Ce-alegi? Scoaterea punctelor periculoase de pe TOATE caile ferate din Romania + reparatii pentru aducerea INTREGII RETELE la un standard decent (estimata in 2008 la 900 milioane de EUR) sau
M6? M6 e inca un
Canal Dunare - Marea Neagra : inutil, risipitor, frumos poate, dar tichie de margaritar pe care nici macar cei mai bogati n-o fac.
3. Utilizatorii. Ajungem la ce se intampla la Oslo sau la Stockholm, unde biletul costa 30 euro pentru trenul de aeroport intr-o singura directie, si oamenii folosesc tot felul de combinatii (autobuz + tren suburban ca sa ajunga la aeroport sau la munca). Dupa 15 ani, au reusit la ARN sa bage si echivalentul S-Bahn prin gara subterana, dar iti iau 9 EUR la iesirea din gara ca supliment.
Quote from: Goldmund on December 29, 2013, 12:20:44 PM
Ar mai fi un motiv pentru care cred ca M6 va fi un succes pentru regiune:
Romania nu are inca nici un oras cu un transport in comun modern suburban(nici un S Bahn), de aceea singura posibilitate a Bucurestiului este si ramane pentru multa vreme metroul care ar trebui extins si in afara granitelor capitalei.(Mogosoaia, Otopeni, Voluntari)
Mogosoaia : 5,232
Otopeni : 10,700
Buftea : 25,000
Ilfov Total : 388,738.
D-aia n-are Bucurestiul transport suburban. Pentru ca n-are suburbii. Cu 1.000.000.000 EUR construim primele suburbii ale Bucurestiului, de exemplu + primul S-Tren. Care va trece si pe la aeroport, intamplator. In loc de un M6 inutil si ultra-scump.
Quote from: Goldmund on December 29, 2013, 12:20:44 PM
Numarul de calatori care ar alege metroul este foarte relativ de estimat:
daca OTP va fi lasat pe mana taximetristilor locali si a unor autobuze-fantoma, majoritatea calatorilor de pe OTP va alege desigur dupa posibilitati, automobilul. Chiar si firmele straine se straduiesc sa-si transporte oamenii cu masinile proprii...Turistii aleg volens-nolens autobuzele sau taxiurile, dar apeleaza foarte des la rude, cunoscuti, prieteni.
Daca M6 ar avea statie sub aeroport, majoritatea ar alege cu siguranta transportul in comun , inclusiv lucratorii de pe OTP
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/acrp/acrp_rpt_004.pdf
Numeri pe degetele unei singure maini aeroporturile unde cota de piata a transporturilor publice (fara Taxi) depaseste 50%: OSL, NRT, HKG si PVG. Toate patru localizate DEPARTE de orasul principal de deservire, toate patru au caracteristici speciale care impiedica transportul privat obiectiv.
OTP
nu are autobuze fantoma, are serviciu non-stop (24H), la orele de varf la 10 minute (cu program afisat), cu indicatoare spre statii, spre doua directii, centru si gara centrala. Capacitatea oferita e peste cea necesara. Nu e nimeni la mana taximetristilor locali - sistemul Taxi La Comanda functioneaza, si inca bine.
Da, bineinteles ca o firma o sa-si trimita angajatii cu masina/taxiul la aeroport - dureaza jumatate din timpul unui tren sau autobuz, si cand platesti diurne, si cand e important sa-ti tratezi clientii/angajatii bine, "a bit of personal touch" este esential. De-aia pasagerii first au transport cu limuzina asigurat de companiile aeriene.
Am vazut rulate modele econometrice folosind distanta, tip de acces rutier, locatie a CBD-ului pentru OTP (erau parte a studiului Hochtief), nici una (nici situatia M6 + autobuze spre Ploiesti si Bucuresti + gara) nu dadea cota de piata mai mare de 35% pt. transport public.
Heathrow Airport Passenger Numbers RiseQuote
The number of passengers passing through Heathrow rose 3 per cent to 72.3m last year.
The figures highlight how the capacity constrained airport is making better use of its two runways partly by airlines flying bigger aircraft.
Although Heathrow is operating close to the maximum permitted number of flights at the airport, and wants to build a third runway, it welcomed extra passengers in 2013, partly because more airlines are using the A380 superjumbo, the world's biggest passenger jet, seating up to 850 people. British Airways, Heathrow's largest airline, started operating the A380 last year.
More broadly, airlines are filling their aircraft to higher levels as they strive for greater efficiency. Load factors – the percentage of seats occupied on flights – rose 1 percentage point to 76.4 per cent at Heathrow in 2013.
The numbers of passengers from China passing through Heathrow increased 19 per cent last year and those from India rose 9 per cent. European passenger traffic increased 4 per cent.
Heathrow is the world's third biggest airport by passenger numbers. It is the largest when measured by international passengers – although Dubai, the fast-growing Gulf hub, is set to overtake Heathrow in 2015, and airports in Amsterdam, Frankfurt and Paris are expanding.
Colin Matthews, chief executive of Heathrow Airport Holdings, said: "Our passenger figures reflect the growing demand for long-haul destinations only a hub airport can support. Yet Heathrow is full, leaving European hubs to add destinations while we look on."
The Airports Commission, set up by the government and chaired by Sir Howard Davies, last month shortlisted Heathrow and Gatwick as potential locations for the UK's next new runway. Both airports want to build an extra runway.
Heathrow's 3 per cent passenger growth last year was flattered by how fewer people flew out of the airport in the run-up to and during the 2012 London Olympics. On an underlying basis, the number of passengers rose 2 per cent in 2013.
Gatwick, the UK's second biggest airport, said its passenger numbers rose 4 per cent to 35.4m last year.
Emirates Airline, the Dubai-based carrier, plans to start an A380 service out of Gatwick in March.
Sursa: Financial Times (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/29cac88c-7c7d-11e3-9179-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2uH5IAMlt)
Airlines fear Brazil backlash from crowded World Cup airportsQuoteInternational airlines are worried the Brazilian government may hit them with a flurry of fines during the World Cup over delayed flights and lost bags at already overcrowded airports, the head of a global airline association said on Thursday.
Less than four months before kickoff, Brazil's busiest airport, in Sao Paulo, is still racing to finish a new terminal and other airports are preparing temporary tents to receive the influx of passengers.
That leaves airlines wary that they will be on the hook for untested baggage handling systems and overcrowded terminals. Many of Brazil's biggest airports are running beyond capacity after years of neglect by state operator Infraero.
"It's very unfair to hold the airlines responsible for every disruption that happens if frankly it's a problem of the infrastructure," said Tony Tyler, head of the International Air Transport Association, ahead of a visit Sao Paulo's Guarulhos International Airport.
His concerns underscore the challenges facing Brazil's aviation industry during the tournament in June and July, which Tyler called the "Aviation Cup." Airlines are adding hundreds of international routes and nearly 2,000 new domestic flights to ferry some 600,000 foreign fans and millions of Brazilian tourists between the dozen cities hosting matches.
Yet work on chronically overcrowded airports is even further behind schedule than the construction of new soccer stadiums for the tournament, which have drawn more ire from organizers as they missed deadlines and ran over budgets.
"It is going to be challenging and people are going to have to be understanding," Tyler told reporters in Sao Paulo. "This is why we're a bit concerned about the very strict regulations that apply in Brazil."
Depending on the length of a delayed flight, airlines in Brazil are responsible for food, transport and accommodations for passengers, regardless of what caused the delay. Blizzards in the United States, by contrast, can lead to cancelled flights without airlines footing the bill, said a spokesman for IATA.
A single stormy weekend in December cost Brazil's No. 2 airline Gol Linhas Aereas (GOLL4.SA) as much as 5 million reais ($2.1 million) in regulatory fines. The scarcity of affordable hotel rooms during the World Cup could make the cost of a canceled flight even more daunting, said Tyler.
The IATA delegation spent Thursday afternoon at Sao Paulo's Guarulhos International Airport, where work on a new terminal is on such a tight schedule that airlines worry they will have no time to test a new baggage handling system, which is crucial to smooth operations.
Brazil's domestic airlines and the busiest international carriers have declined to move operations into the new terminal before the tournament.
Fewer than a dozen foreign airlines are expected to move in by June, many with just a couple flights per day. Those that do may fall back on ad hoc baggage handling solutions, said Tyler.
"I think baggage is going to be a challenge," he said. "It will be made to work ... even if it means throwing people at processes that in due time will become properly automated."
Sursa: Reuters (http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/02/20/uk-soccer-world-airlines-idUKBREA1J2B720140220)
And the world's best airport is ...QuoteSingapore Changi Airport has been crowned the best in the world for the second year in a row at the World Airport Awards, announced Wednesday in Barcelona, Spain.
Changi, which also won the award for best airport leisure amenities, beat out second-place Incheon International Airport in South Korea and third-place Munich Airport in Germany.
The awards are based on surveys conducted by Skytrax, an international travel research and consultants firm, which polled 12.85 million passengers across 110 nationalities about 395 airports worldwide.
7 of the world's most entertaining airports
"Changi Airport offers a travel experience in itself and continues to develop its quality standards to be named the world's favourite airport again," Edward Plaisted, CEO of Skytrax, said in a news release.
"Changi Airport is a well-known leader and innovator for the airport industry and genuinely delights and surprises travellers who are lucky enough to enjoy the airport facilities. Changi Airport demonstrates how to make the airport experience an enjoyable part of the journey that is so important in today's fast-moving world."
Changi served more than 52 million passengers in 2012. No wonder it's popular: The airport has an on-site movie theater, swimming pool, gardens and trails.
A day in the life of the world's busiest airport
Five of this year's top 10 airports were based in East Asian cities, and four were in Europe, just like last year's award winners. Just one North American airport -- Vancouver -- cracked the top 10.
The World's Best Airports 2014
1. Singapore Changi Airport
2. Incheon International Airport (South Korea)
3. Munich Airport (Germany)
4. Hong Kong International Airport
5. Amsterdam Schiphol Airport
6. Tokyo International Airport (Haneda)
7. Beijing Capital International Airport
8. Zurich Airport (Switzerland)
9. Vancouver International Airport (Canada)
10. London Heathrow Airport (England)
A full list of the winners and prize categories from the World Airport Awards can be found at www.worldairportawards.com (http://www.worldairportawards.com/).
Sursa: CNN (http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/27/travel/worlds-best-airports-skytrax/index.html?sr=fb032814airportbest6pstorygal)
Cum e facut topul asta de a iesit asa pentru Europa de Est?
1 Budapest Ferenc Liszt Int'l Airport BUD Budapest Hungary
2 Kiev Boryspil Int'l Airport KBP Kiev Ukraine
3 Lennart Meri Tallinn Airport TLL Tallinn Estonia
4 Riga International Airport RIX Riga Latvia
5 Bratislava MR Štefánik Airport BTS Bratislava Slovakia
6 Belgrade Nikola Tesla Int'l Airport BEG Belgrade Serbia
7 Tbilisi International Airport TBS Tbilisi Georgia
8 Sofia Airport SOF Sofia Bulgaria
9 Varna Airport VAR Varna Bulgaria
10 Burgas Airport BOJ Burgas Bulgaria
OTP?!
Imi vine greu sa cred ca e sub aeroporturile vecinilor de la sud (no offense).
Cred ca s-a facut pe baza unor chestionare ale pasagerilor si atunci e posibil sa iasa asa. Romanii au obiceiul sa zica ca totul e naspa si atunci e normal ca noi sa fim foarte jos, apoi in lista apare si Tbilisi, evident ca i-as da si eu o nota foarte mare la un terminal destul de modern, mare si aproape gol.
(http://www.us-rentacar.com/passport_control_area_tbilisi_airport_2227_400_400_1.jpg)
Cum sa nu fii multumit cand nu ai de asteptat la nicio coada si nu te inghesui cu o gramada de oameni?
Surprinzatoare sunt totusi clasarea celor trei din Bulgaria, Belgradul si Bratislava, cu mult sub Otopeni dupa parerea mea, dar na...
Qatar Airways Provides Hamad Airport's Ceremonial 'First Flight'QuoteAfter a five-year delay, Doha's Hamad International Airport is open for business. Although other passenger aircraft had already used its runways on a limited number of special occasions, the airport welcomed a celebratory Qatar Airways' VIP flight on April 30 to mark what it describes as its: "soft opening."
The Qatar Airways A320 aircraft, which left Doha International Airport just before 11:00am, landed on Hamad International Airport's Easterly runway shortly afterwards. Upon arrival, QR7450 was greeted by a traditional water salute and a warm welcome from gathering crowds at gate B3, on one of the airport's new concourses. Onboard the inaugural flight to Hamad International Airport were VIPs and other dignitaries, including; Minister of Transportation, His Excellency Mr Jassim Al Sulaiti, Chief Executive Officer of Qatar Airways, His Excellency Mr Akbar Al Baker and Chairman of the Qatar Civil Aviation Authority, His Excellency Mr Abdul Aziz Mohammad Al Noaimi.
Also onboard were NDIA Project Director, Mr Bernardo Gogna, together with other members of the New Doha International Airport Steering Committee, Mr Nassr Al Ansari, Mr Mohammad Al Meer, Mr Abdulla Al Muraikhi, Mr Abdulla Al Asiri, Mr Eissa Al Rumaihi, Mr Ali Al Abdulla, Mr Saad Al Otaibi and Dr Jaffar Abdulrahim. Joining them were Manager of Airport Security, Mr Eissa Arrar Al Romaihi, Manager of Airport Immigration, Colonel Mohamed Al Mazroui and Aeronautical College Manager, Mr Ali Al Malki.
Designed to accommodate 30 million passengers annually, rising to 50 million upon full completion, the airport covers an area of 29km² and is 60% built on land reclaimed from the Gulf.
Currently, ten airlines are now operating fully from Hamad International Airport; Biman Bangladesh; flydubai; Air Arabia; Iran Air; Air India Express; Yemenia; Pakistan International; Syrian Airlines; Pegasus Airlines and Nepal Airlines.
Qatar Airways will move its entire hub operations to Hamad International Airport on May 27.
Qatar Airways Chief Executive Officer, His Excellency Mr Akbar Al Baker said: "It is a historic moment, not only in the history of our airline, but for the State of Qatar, to see this Qatar Airways VIP flight touch down at the newly opened Hamad International Airport.
"Today's highly anticipated opening of the new airport signifies to the world that Doha is now ready to open its doors for passengers to experience an airport that transforms the travel experience, and it is with much excitement that we await the move of all Qatar Airways flights to this new facility on May 27."
(http://www.airportsinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Qatar-A320-600x363.jpg)
Sursa (http://www.airportsinternational.com/2014/05/qatar-airways-provides-hamad-airports-ceremonial-first-flight/15563)
(http://dohanews.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Ali-Hassan-Desert-Horse-Sculpture.png)
(http://dohanews.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Urs-Fischer-Lamp-Bear.jpg)
(http://dohanews.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Tom-Claassen-Oryxs2.jpg)
(http://i2.wp.com/dohanews.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Tom-Otterness-Playground.jpg?resize=762%2C787)
(http://www.hoteliermiddleeast.com/pictures/gallery/Hamad-International.jpg)
Ia uitati ce am gasit :D
(http://www.adp-i.com/sites/default/files/styles/xlarge/public/eau_jebel_ali_plan_masse_fr.jpg?itok=01PbZTBp)
Cica ar fi un nou aeroport pe care il construiesc EAU care cand va fi gata total va transporta pana la 160 de milioane de pasageri
Am mai gasit asta (http://www.dwc.ae/project-details/al-maktoum-international-airport/). Aveti voi mai multe detalii?
Quote from: iuli on May 02, 2014, 07:25:25 PM
Qatar Airways Provides Hamad Airport's Ceremonial 'First Flight'
construit parca de Bechtel. :D
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/05/travel/airports-2015/index.html
Quote from: alecu26 on June 20, 2014, 09:15:28 AM
construit parca de Bechtel. :D
Bechtel a fost manager de proiect, supervizor general si inginer consultant. Ei se ocupa si de dezvoltarea pe termen lung a aeroportului. Proiectarea a fost asigurata de Hellmuth-Obata-Kassebaum (HOK). Constructia efectiva a fost facuta de TAV, CCC (Consolidated Contractors Company), Bechtel, Taisei si Takenaka.
Aeroportul din Budapesta a inceput lucrarile la noul hangar pentru Wizz Air, care vor incepe operatiunile de mentenanta in septembrie anul viitor. Contractorul este Market Építő Zrt.
Quote
Ordu Giresun, primul aeroport din Europa pe o insula artificiala
Pe 22 mai, presedintele Turciei a inaugurat aeroportul Ordu Giresun (OGU / LTCB), primul din Europa construit pe o insula artificiala.
Situat la jumatatea distantei dintre orasele Ordu si Giresun, aeroportul este al 8-lea din lume construit pe o insula artificiala si al 52-lea aeroport din Turcia, tara care vrea sa aiba 60 de aeroporturi pana in 2023. Cu o capacitate de doua milioane pasageri / an, aeroportul are o pista lunga de 3 km si lata de 45 de metri, 35 de milioane de tone de pamant si piatra fiind necesare pentru constructia lui. Costul proiectului inceput in 1992 (lucrarile au debutat in 1994): 125 de milioane de euro. Momentan, Turkish Airlines este singurul operator care ofera zboruri comerciale.
(http://aeronews.ro/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/IMG_5373.jpg)
Sursa (http://aeronews.ro/ordu-giresun-primul-aeroport-din-europa-pe-o-insula-artificiala/)
Cateva corectii legate de articol. Nu doar Turkish are zboruri ci si AnadoluJet care leaga aeroportul de Ankara si de Istanbul-Sabiha Gökçen. Constructia a inceput in 1994 dupa ce proiectul a fost aprobat in 1992. Dupa scurt timp lucrarile au fost abandonate din motive economice, costuri prea mari si faptul ca nu era sustenabil economic. A reinceput constructia in 2011.
In articol se mentioneaza ca sunt 8 aeroporturi construite pe o insula artificiala. Asta nu am reusit sa aflu daca e adevarat sau nu, dar am rezerve.
Am evitat sa pun articolul din sursa asta pentru ca avea lacune.
primul aeroport din Europa pe o insula artificiala? de cand "Giresun" e in Europa?
Au copiat de pe Wikipedia dar nu complet si corect. :(
Mai dau si eu citate de pe site-ul lor dar incerc sa le citesc inainte.
Am remarcat si eu greseala de continent, dar am postat articolul fiindca personal chiar nu stiam de existenta acestui proiect.
Multumim! Nu e vina ta... ;)
Te asteptam si cu alte contributii pe aceasta arie.
Aeroportul din Malaga
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-2TtIrnKvHeI/VXVNi_5iihI/AAAAAAAABKI/w_kUombLhi8/w958-h719-no/SAM_0886.JPG)
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-riVG61ICRSY/VXVNkWARsAI/AAAAAAAABKg/10ckq-3m1o8/w958-h719-no/SAM_0887.JPG)
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-qNP68t4zyNc/VXVNkkVPWwI/AAAAAAAABKo/6AROIncJTSA/w958-h719-no/SAM_0889.JPG)
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-czui8IqB-18/VXVNlQZbUjI/AAAAAAAABLA/JftkGx5KSGs/w958-h719-no/SAM_0894.JPG)
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-5-Y_CTzIXqs/VXVNkpaJ-UI/AAAAAAAABKk/IsBed4kCC4o/w958-h719-no/SAM_0888.JPG)
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-eHd5UXWfVvc/VXVNrAyEvZI/AAAAAAAABMc/hBmdqX_3Iqw/w958-h538-no/WP_20150602_002.jpg)
Pentru ca am discutat aici (http://forum.peundemerg.ro/index.php?topic=99.msg76802#msg76802) despe aeroportul Funchal, aveti si experienta traita de catre un pilot cand face un approach si o aterizare pe acest aeroport.
https://www.youtube.com/v/ssicuv-BNkQ
Un articol excelent despre o"reusita" made in Germany. :lol:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2015-07-23/how-berlin-s-futuristic-airport-became-a-6-billion-embarrassment
Probleme si prin Malaysia, cu noul terminal din KUALA LUMPUR. 1 mld dolari investitia.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-26/kuala-lumpur-s-1-billion-air-terminal-is-sinking-airline-says
Heathrow Airport runway decision delayed until summerQuoteA decision on whether to build a third runway at Heathrow Airport has been delayed until at least next summer, the government has confirmed. Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin said further research on the environmental impact was needed. A decision had previously been promised by the end of this year.
Business groups reacted with dismay at the news, with one group describing it as "gutless", but opponents welcomed the extra focus on the environment. "The case for aviation expansion is clear - but it's vitally important we get the decision right so that it will benefit generations to come," said Mr McLoughlin. "We will undertake more work on environmental impacts, including air quality, noise and carbon."
An independent report on airport expansion by Sir Howard Davies in July backed a plan to build a third runway at Heathrow.
But he said that the new runway should come with severe restrictions to reduce the environmental and noise effects, and did not completely rule out another runway at Gatwick or doubling an existing runway at Heathrow.
This latest development means these two other options are still on the table and opponents argue the delay weakens Heathrow's position.
Gatwick described the delay as a "defining moment" in the airport expansion debate.
"We are glad that the government recognises that more work on environmental impact needs to be done," said its chief executive Stewart Wingate. "Air quality, for example, is a public health priority and obviously the legal safeguards around it cannot be wished away," he added. And Heathrow Hub, the group behind the proposal for extending a runway at Heathrow, said the delay "seemed sensible". But Heathrow Airport said it had "full confidence" its plans could meet "tough environmental conditions" and would now "move into the delivery phase".
Plenty of business and union leaders will be frustrated at yet another delay to the airports' decision. But the government says it needs more time to pick a winner. Ministers want another six months to drill down into the impact any new runway will have on air quality and the people who'll live under the flight path. A cynic might point out it helps them out of a political hole. Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith said he would resign and force a by-election if they picked Heathrow. But he'll be tied up with the London mayoral election, which is to be held on 5 May 2016.
Still, ministers do need to get this decision legally watertight.
Campaigners around Heathrow have already told me they plan to take any expansion plans to court, and they think the impact of a bigger airport on local traffic pollution is their best chance of winning.
Business groups reacted with anger at the delay. They argue that a lack of space at airports is damaging the economy.
"Business leaders will be tearing their hair out at the news that, yet again, a decision on expanding the UK's airport capacity has been delayed," said Simon Walker from the Institute of Directors. "Of course this is difficult choice, which is the reason the government set up the Airports Commission to make a recommendation balancing economic needs, environmental concerns and the impact on local residents," he continued. "We have to ask now, what was the point of the Commission if the government still fails to act?"
Meanwhile the business lobby group, the CBI said the decision was "deeply disappointing" and the British Chambers of Commerce described it as "gutless".
Sursa: BBC (http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35062739)
(http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/B0D0/production/_87046254_heathrow_proposed_expansion_624_flat.png)
(http://www.constructionnews.co.uk/pictures/2000x1333/9/2/6/3001926_heathrow_1758168551405.jpg)
http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=147691257
Dubai International passenger traffic tops 6.25m in OctQuote(http://www.khaleejtimes.com/storyimage/KT/20151210/ARTICLE/312109865/AR/0/AR-312109865.jpg&MaxW=780&imageVersion=16by9&NCS_modified=20151211044122)
Passenger traffic at Dubai International rose 4.4 per cent in October, according to latest report issued by operator Dubai Airports.
Passenger numbers in October this year totalled 6.25 million compared to 5.98 million recorded in same month last year. Year-to-date traffic rose 11.2 per cent to 64.94 million compared to 58.41 million recorded during the same period last year.
"Traffic continues its steady climb as we approach the end of what will be another record year for both cargo and passenger numbers," said Paul Griffiths, chief executive of Dubai Airports.
Aircraft movements rose to 34,917 during October, up 6.5 per cent from the 32,798 recorded during the same month last year. Year-to-date aircraft movements were up 16 per cent to 337,316 compared to 290,779 recorded during the corresponding period in 2014 due to primarily to the impact of the 80-day runway upgrade programme conducted last year.
Passengers per aircraft movement in October came in at 188, while the year to date figure remained a high 202 - driven by the Emirates' fleet of wide-body aircraft.
"With traffic rising over four per cent to 6.2 million passengers for October 2015, Dubai International's growth is coming in thick and fast. Year-to-date traffic is already up a whopping 11 per cent, putting the airport on track to not only exceed 2014s record figures, but also consolidate and expand its lead as the world's busiest international airport," Saj Ahmad, chief analyst at London-based StrategicAero Research, told Khaleej Times.
"As ever, the relentless drive to expand by Emirates and flydubai, the two biggest incumbents at the airport, have led the way in pulling traffic into and through Dubai," he added.
Eastern Europe topped all markets in terms of percentage passenger growth, followed by North America, as a result of Emirates increasing capacity on several routes and launch of additional daily flights to both New York and Seattle, and Africa .
In terms of overall passenger traffic, the Indian sub-continent was the top market during the month, closely followed by Western Europe. India remained the top country for passenger numbers. UK, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and US rounded out the top five.
Air freight traffic was up 7.6 per cent for the month with volumes of 215,714 tonnes compared to 200,435 tonnes recorded during the same month last year. Year-to-date cargo traffic totalled 2,068,844 tonnes, up 3.1 per cent from the 2,006,884 tonnes shipped during the first ten months of last year.
Sursa (http://www.khaleejtimes.com/business/aviation/dubai-international-passenger-traffic-tops-625m-in-oct)
Dubai International Reeling in Atlanta, Beijing in Airport RanksQuoteDubai International Airport, previously the world's sixth-busiest hub, narrowed the gap to the top two of Atlanta and Beijing last year after piling on 11 percent more passengers, spurred by the expansion of local carrier Emirates and its mammoth fleet of wide-body jets.
(http://vizts.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/dubai-international-airport-terminal-3.jpg)
Dubai's tally reached 78 million, a jump of 7.5 million, according to figures released Monday. While Atlanta Hartfield-Jackson, the main base for Delta Air Lines Inc., remains the busiest airport, its total of 101.5 million customers rose only 5.3 million. Beijing Capital airport added 3.8 million to reach 89.9 million.
Dubai International Airport, previously the world's sixth-busiest hub, narrowed the gap to the top two of Atlanta and Beijing last year after piling on 11 percent more passengers, spurred by the expansion of local carrier Emirates and its mammoth fleet of wide-body jets.
(http://media.bizj.us/view/img/2907711/airport-photos3*750xx4256-2394-0-219.jpg)
Dubai's tally reached 78 million, a jump of 7.5 million, according to figures released Monday. While Atlanta Hartfield-Jackson, the main base for Delta Air Lines Inc., remains the busiest airport, its total of 101.5 million customers rose only 5.3 million. Beijing Capital airport added 3.8 million to reach 89.9 million.
Sursa: Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-01/dubai-international-reeling-in-atlanta-beijing-in-airport-ranks)
https://www.youtube.com/v/4hAhNSVzRZE
Munich Airport and Lufthansa open a new satellite terminalQuoteThe successful joint venture between Munich Airport and Lufthansa continues with the launch of a new satellite terminal. Europe's only five-star airport is again setting new standards for excellent service, passenger comfort and sustainability.
The new facility will give Munich Airport 27 new gate positions where passengers can board aircraft directly without bus transportation. With the new satellite facility, the capacity of Terminal 2, which is used by Lufthansa and its Star Alliance partners, will be increased by 11 million to 36 million passengers per year. As one of the world's most advanced passenger facilities, the satellite terminal will offer passengers pleasant surroundings with a wide range of shopping and dining options in attractive and spacious areas flooded with natural light. Passengers will also have five new Lufthansa lounges to choose from.
(http://ftnnews.com/images/stories/airport/2016/munich-sat-terminal.jpg)
The satellite has no direct landside transportation links. Check-in will take place in Terminal 2. Passengers will then undergo passport screening and hand baggage checks before boarding the airport's own underground transport system that will take them to the satellite terminal in barely a minute. Here they will experience the same high standards of quality they have come to expect in Terminal 2. Of course they will have free access to the airport-wide Wi-Fi network, and can plug their devices into USB and power outlets in the waiting areas.
(http://ftnnews.com/images/stories/airport/2016/munich-sat-terminal2.jpg)
Awaiting passengers in the satellite terminal will have an entirely new dining and shopping experience, with 15 retail areas, seven restaurants and cafes and three duty free zones in a spacious, 7,000 square meter setting.
The satellite also features plenty of services to meet the needs and desires of the modern traveller, including quiet areas with reclining chairs, play areas for children, changing tables in the men's and women's washrooms, and four showers. All services are situated at the center of the new building for quick and convenient access by customers. From here the five new Lufthansa lounges are just steps away. With an area of 4,000 square meters, this nearly doubles the total area of the Terminal 2 lounge facilities. The new concept features a roof terrace, panoramic windows and a bar overlooking the airport apron.
Forming the heart of the new passenger facility is the central marketplace, which is flooded with natural light. Market stands, each with a theme, are an authentic tribute to the Viktualienmarkt, Munich's renowned open-air market.
The satellite also sets new standards for environmentally friendly operations and energy efficiency. Advanced building materials and innovative heating, cooling and lighting technologies reduce energy consumption to a minimum. A 40 percent reduction in CO2 emissions in the new facility as compared with the airport's existing terminal buildings is achieved partly through special "climate-optimized facades": These 4.5 meter wide zones separate the air conditioned interior of the satellite from the outdoor space, acting as a climate buffer while providing usable space with escalators for passengers to change levels. The facade is made of a newly developed type of glass with a special coating that allows sunlight to enter while keeping out the heat.
The satellite terminal was built within budget and on schedule: Total investments in the satellite terminal amount to about 900 million euros, including the costs for the new building itself, the expansion of the baggage sorting facility and the construction work on the ramps and taxiways near the terminal. The costs for the building and expanding the baggage sorting facility are being shared on a 60:40 basis by Munich Airport and Lufthansa, The entire cost of the improvements to the ramp was covered by the airport.
Sursa (http://ftnnews.com/aviation/30022-munich-airport-and-lufthansa-open-a-new-satellite-terminal.html)
Munich Airport's showpiece new satellite terminal opensQuoteAt the heart of the pedestrians-only center of Munich lies a huge open-air food market where you can buy almost any kind of food you can name. Having purchased food at the market, on a nice day you can also consume it there, sitting outdoors at one of many rows of communal benches and tables, in true biergarden style.
And the market has a sizable biergarden too, where Bavarians meet old friends and make new ones over a stein of beer made at any one of the six traditional breweries located in Munich.
This 240,000-square-foot open space is the Viktualienmarkt, a Munich jewel which dates back to 1807. You would think it couldn't be more different from Munich's newest jewel, the €900 million ($1.01 billion) Terminal 2 Satellite facility at Munich Airport, which was inaugurated in a dazzling ceremony on April 22 and opens for business on April 26.
kontron newestBut it turns out the T2 Satellite isn't so different from the Viktualienmarkt after all. In homage to the old market, Munich Airport and Lufthansa – which together financed, built and operate Terminal 2 and its new, 11-million annual passenger-capacity satellite in a 60:40 joint venture (JV) – designed the satellite's central area as a natural light-filled market square where food stalls, restaurants and shops surround bench-and-table communal seating.
This must be one of the most uniquely pleasant airport-terminal dining areas anywhere. On the benches, passengers boarding flights from any of the satellite's 52 gates (which feed 27 aircraft contact points, each with an airbridge) can eat food and quaff beer or beverages purchased from the square's food stalls (each has a different theme), restaurants and shops. Or they can just sit there while waiting to board, if they wish: several gates are located near the market square.
The floor of the satellite's market square is on the fourth of the satellite's six floors. To make the square feel very open within the satellite's 1.35 million square feet (125,800 square meters) of overall floor space, the square's ceiling is more than 60 feet above its floor. All around, the satellite's fifth and sixth floors look down on the market-square – but each floor has a three-meter-high wall of thick glass reaching to within a meter of its ceiling.
According to Philipp Ahrens, the joint Satellite project leader from Munich Airport, these high glass walls were installed to comply with state regulations aimed at preventing anyone from being able to throw passports, boarding cards or weapons from one floor to another to circumvent security and immigration checks.
(https://i2.wp.com/www.runwaygirlnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ATF2181.jpg?w=3712&ssl=1)
The eastern side of the market square looks on to a glassed-off area through which the thick column of the East Apron Control Tower rises, between the six-floor satellite's inner glass wall and its outer glass wall. During its construction, the satellite terminal – which started life in 2003 as a two-level midfield baggage-sorting facility serving the aircraft remote-parking stands located on the apron's eastern edge – was integrated with the tall control tower, which is operated by apron controllers employed by the Munich Airport T2 operating JV.
Ahrens says it was necessary to drill into the tower's column during construction of the satellite's four passenger floors. All the drilling had to be performed at night: drilling during the day would have made the apron controllers unable to hear communications with aircraft and even among themselves.
Together, the satellite's outer and inner glass walls – both of which were treated with a coating which allows sunlight to pass, but not its associated heat – create a climate barrier which allows the operating JV to cool (or heat) each satellite floor's gate, lounge and walking areas in a much more energy-efficient way than it can in Terminal 2.
When passengers change floors in the satellite, which many have to do because passenger boarding and disembarkation on flights to and from Schengen Area, EU non-Schengen and intercontinental destinations are separated by floor level, they do so using escalators located between the inner and outer glass walls.
This allows further energy-efficiency: because passengers only spend seconds changing floors, the area between the satellite's walls isn't cooled or heated as much as the area within the inner glass wall. The T2/Satellite operating JV estimates that the satellite's power generation creates 40 percent less CO2 per square meter than does T2's power generation.
(https://i0.wp.com/www.runwaygirlnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ATF2224.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&ssl=1)
The T2 Satellite exactly mirrors Terminal 2 – which opened in 2003 – in that all Schengen-area arrivals and departures are at gate entrances and exits on the fourth floor. All non-Schengen European passengers use gate entrances/exits on the fifth floor. All intercontinental passengers use gate entrances/exits on the sixth floor.
All T2 Satellite origin-and-destination passengers have to pass through Terminal 2 itself: they check in, pass through security checkpoints and exit there. So the separation of arriving Schengen, non-Schengen and intercontinental passengers extends to their being guided into separate cars in the automated passenger transport rail system which, running under the apron, whisks passengers the 400-meter distance between T2 and the satellite in less than a minute.
Although the satellite's total floor area is much less than half that of T2, it boasts 44,131 square feet of premium-class lounge space, very nearly as much as does T2, which has 50,375 square feet of lounge space. Lufthansa operates five lounges in the new satellite: Business Class and Senator Lounges on both levels four and five and a First Class/HON Circle lounge on level six. Other Star Alliance carriers' premium-class passengers also can use these lounges.
(https://i0.wp.com/www.runwaygirlnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/SAT_Event_Bubbles_2015-10-19-19.jpg?w=2200&ssl=1)
Sursa (https://www.runwaygirlnetwork.com/2016/04/23/munich-airports-showpiece-new-satellite-terminal-opens/)
St Helena Airport is now certified(http://www.airlive.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/unnamed.jpg)
QuoteAnother major milestone for St Helena Airport was achieved yesterday afternoon, Tuesday 10 May 2016, when Air Safety Support International (ASSI) issued an Aerodrome Certificate to St Helena Airport – having been satisfied that the Airport infrastructure, aviation security measures and air traffic control service complies with international aviation safety and security standards. This follows a final inspection of the Airport by an ASSI team last month.
Airport Certification is a significant achievement for any airport and even more so for a brand new airport. But it is an ongoing process. St Helena's first Aerodrome Certificate is valid until 9 November 2016, at which point the Airport will need to be re-certified.
Airport Certification from ASSI and operational readiness are parallel processes – so wind shear and turbulence mitigation is a separate issue which does not affect the certification of St Helena Airport.
The commencement of flights is an operational readiness issue. Work is continuing in parallel on operational readiness at St Helena Airport, including the work that is now underway to manage issues of turbulence and wind shear experienced by the Comair Implementation Flight.
Sursa (http://www.airlive.net/all-articles/page/2/)
QuoteSaint Helena Airport (IATA: HLE, ICAO: FHSH) is an international airport that has been under construction since early 2012 in the British Overseas Territory of Saint Helena, a remote island in the south Atlantic Ocean. Scheduled air services from Johannesburg were scheduled to commence on 21 May 2016. However, on 26 April 2016 the St. Helena Government announced an indefinite delay to the opening because of concerns about wind shear.[3] After the airport opens, the ship RMS Saint Helena, the only other transport that regularly serves the island, is due to be retired.
Saint Helena is more than 2,000 kilometres (1,200 mi) from the nearest major landmass, and can only be reached by sea. This takes five days from Cape Town, with departure once per three weeks, making Saint Helena one of the most remote populated places on earth, measured as travel time from major cities.
The airport is being built on Prosperous Bay Plain, on the east side of Saint Helena, entailing a concrete runway of 1,850 metres (6,070 ft) with taxiway and apron, approximately 8 million cubic metres (280 million cu ft) rockfill embankment through which a 750-metre (2,460 ft) long reinforced concrete culvert will run, an airport terminal building of 3,500 square metres (38,000 sq ft) and support infrastructure, air traffic control and safety, bulk fuel installation for six million litres of diesel and aviation fuel, a 14-kilometre (9 mi) airport access road from Rupert's Bay to the airport, and all related logistics.
Due to the short runway and the long distance to South Africa, a Boeing 737-700 flying to Johannesburg will not be able to use its full seat and cargo capacity. Only flights to and from Namibian and Angolan destinations would allow using a Boeing 737-700 near its full load capacity. The operator for the other planned destination, London, plans a fuel stop in the Gambia, at almost the same distance as Johannesburg.
Sursa: Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Helena_Airport)
(http://www.sainthelena.gov.sh/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Wildcat-over-St-Helena-Airport-14-October-20151.jpg)
(http://www.airsafety.aero/getmedia/a36d4117-c668-4339-a9a0-bdc0d96d373a/SHAP_Airport_Jun_2015.aspx)
Am zburat saptamana asta de pe BRU..
Doar in Israel mai vezi asa nivel de securitate: verificare masina inainte de intrare in aeroport, prima verificare bagaje intr-un cort in fata aeroportului si apoi filtrele "normale" de securitate in cadrul aeroportului. Extra: nu poti intra pe la Arrivals daca ai parcat in P1 sau P2 (parter). Soldatii te redirectioneaza prin parcare neaparat la etajul 1
https://www.youtube.com/v/hJJS1_WRDgA
Heathrow runway 'within EU pollution laws'QuoteNew, independent research seen by the BBC suggests Heathrow airport could build a new runway without breaking European pollution laws.
The study measured poisonous nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels using 40 sensors in and around the airport.
It then used modelling to predict what would happen in the future.
However, the Aviation Environment Federation (AEF) said the research was "highly speculative" and there was no guarantee pollution levels would fall.
Ministers will decide within weeks whether to enlarge Heathrow or rival Gatwick and the environmental impact will play a big part in that decision.
The work was led by the University of Cambridge and has no formal links to any airport or the government.
Prof Rod Jones from the University of Cambridge told the BBC: "If there is the development of a third runway, we expect there to be a marginal increase in NO2 coming from the airport itself, but that would be against the background of reduced NO2 from other traffic, because of Euro 6 engines and electrification of the traffic fleet."
In other words, it comes down to traffic on the roads, rather than planes in the air, because that is where the bulk of the poisonous nitrogen dioxide gases come from.
As new, cleaner car, lorry and bus engines become more common, pollution levels should decline, wiping out any increase from a bigger Heathrow.
(http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/421E/production/_90162961_heathrow.jpg)
However, Cait Hewitt, deputy director of the AEF, said that the plan was for the third runway to be operational by the 2020s.
"The assumption would have to be that over the next decade, we'd move from having something like 57% of London's vehicles fleet being diesel vehicles to instead having ultra-clean electric vehicles throughout the capital. There just isn't evidence to suggest that's going to happen," said Ms Hewitt.
Prof Jones said using lots of smaller sensors, dotted in hard to reach places, gave them a clearer picture of what was going on.
"By deploying a network of sensors we can tell directly from the measurements, what's been emitted locally from Heathrow airport and what's been blown in, mostly from central London. That's the real strength of the sensor network," he said.
"The major result from this study is that we have tested the models far more critically than you can from a single measurement site."
Currently, the air has climbed above European health limits at several sites near Heathrow. This work suggests that as cleaner engines kick in levels will fall again.
It is a conclusion that tallies broadly with previous research for the government, but that research relied on estimates, whereas this latest work used more accurate, real-world measurements.
Opponents think air quality is the Achilles heel for Heathrow expansion and could be where it is challenged in the courts. That is what happened the last time they wanted to build a third runway.
Airport expansion has been shoved under a carpet in Downing Street for decades, but now the Conservatives say they want to get on with it.
The current "hot date" for a decision is 18 October, but it could change.
Picking Heathrow would put the cat among the pigeons, because a number of high-profile ministers, including Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and Education Secretary Justine Greening, are against the scheme. Chancellor Phillip Hammond has also favoured Gatwick in the past.
(http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/0A04/production/_91546520_9140f121-a2ad-4562-a4b0-ef96562a8b10.jpg)
Prime Minister Theresa May could give her MPs a free vote on the issue to avoid anyone having to resign.
Interestingly, Mrs May's constituency sits under the flight-path but it's hard to find her openly opposing expansion. Opponents at the Heathrow Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise managed to dig out this from her website on May 2010, when the coalition came in and cancelled Labour's third runway scheme. It's not on the website now, they had to use a special archiving service to find it.
Ms May said at the time: "Like many local residents, I strongly welcome [the] cancellation of the third runway at Heathrow. Expanding Heathrow in this way would have had a detrimental effect on the Maidenhead and Twyford areas by increasing levels of noise and pollution, and today's announcement is a victory for all those who have campaigned against it."
Her predecessor David Cameron painted himself into a corner over the issue in the run-up to the 2010 election, when he said he would never expand Heathrow if he became PM.
Ministers still have three options: a third runway at Heathrow, a second at Gatwick, or a third scheme that would double the length of one of Heathrow's existing runways.
[...]
Sursa: BBC (http://www.bbc.com/news/business-37566361?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_england&ns_source=twitter&ns_linkname=english_regions)
Hamad International, Doha.
(http://i.imgur.com/puK6tAb.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/HpxgPlu.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/b4cvtwA.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/hoLIAwS.jpg)
Aeronews (https://www.facebook.com/Aeronews.ro/posts/1134115836664515)
Quote from: Ionut on October 12, 2016, 12:45:44 PM
Hamad International, Doha.
In poze arata mult mai bine decat experienta pentru mare parte din pasageri (experienta tipica a mea e chior de somn, la 2:05 dimineata, dupa n-spe ore de zbor si inainte de alte n-spe ore de zbor, fugind sa-ti prinzi conexiunea spre "mai departe").
Aeroporturile din Orientul Mijlociu (Doha, Dubai, Abu Dhabi...) se umplu seara tarziu (aproape de miezul noptii) cu bancul dinspre Europa, si se golesc la loc dimineata devreme (2-3-4) odata ce pleaca bancul spre Asia. Apoi iar se umple dimineata devreme (4-5-6) cu cursele care vin din Asia si se goleste la loc pe la pranz cand pleaca cele spre Europa.
P.S. Daca zbori cu Qatar si ai escala suficient de lunga, si e o ora decenta, poti face si turul orasului pe gratis (n-ai nevoie nici de viza, rezolva ei totul). Si daca ai o escala de peste 8 ore, te baga la ceva hotel (la fel, n-ai nevoie de viza), complet gratis. Eu am nimerit la Best Western - 11 ore escala dupa un zbor de 15.
Hong Kong...
(http://i.imgur.com/m2DOBGw.jpg)
Aeronews (https://www.facebook.com/Aeronews.ro/photos/a.324280387648068.75294.104563622953080/1159205360822229/?type=3&theater)
380 si 737, in Tijuana.
(http://i.imgur.com/dqYAmhi.jpg)
Air Brasil (https://www.facebook.com/airbraszil/photos/a.1505436719772821.1073741828.1504893056493854/1721601201489704/)
Mda, fara comentarii... DXB atunci si acum...
(http://i.imgur.com/sa7sBeW.jpg)
Aeronews (https://www.facebook.com/Aeronews.ro/photos/a.324280387648068.75294.104563622953080/1168466036562828/?type=3&theater)
Changi Airport (http://www.changiairport.com/)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5eSVBi2SaA
Dubai vrea să construiască cel mai mare aeroport din lume
Emiratul Dubai intenţionează să cheltuie 35,7 miliarde de dolari pentru a construi un al doilea aeroport, Al Maktoum International, şi un centru logistic în sudul oraşului, iar o parte semnificativă din finanţarea proiectului se va face pe bază de datorii, au declarat joi două surse din apropierea acestui dosar pentru Bloomberg.
Potrivit surselor, investiţiile vor fi făcute în următorii 12 ani în Dubai World Central şi facilităţile asociate, inclusiv aeroportul Al Maktoum International. Planurile de cheltuieli sunt detaliate în documentele care invită băncile să facă oferte pentru un credit de trei miliarde de dolari pe care guvernul din Dubai vrea să îl contracteze pentru prima fază a proiectului, adaugă sursele. Creditul, care ar urma să fie strâns de o companie dedicată acestui proiect, va fi rambursat de Departamentul de Finanţe din Dubai pe baza unei formule care ţine cont de numărul de pasageri care vor tranzita prin cele două aeroporturi din Dubai, mai susţin sursele. De asemenea, în viitor compania va strânge finanţare pentru acest proiect prin emiterea de datorii.
Potrivit informaţiilor publicate pe pagina de Internet a companiei Dubai Airports, viitorul aeroport Al Maktoum International va fi construit în centrul Dubai World Central, un proiect de dezvoltare pe şase zone, care acoperă o suprafaţă totală de 140 de kilometri pătraţi, incluzând spaţii pentru logistică, rezidenţiale, birouri şi terenuri de golf. Costurile de dezvoltare pentru întregul proiect Dubai World Central sunt estimate la peste 32 de miliarde de dolari.
La finalizare, Al Maktoum International va fi cel mai mare aeroport din lume, cu o capacitate de peste 220 de milioane de pasageri şi 16 milioane tone de marfă pe an. Viitorul aeroport este în apropierea zonei unde se va desfăşura Expoziţia Mondială din 2020, în sudul oraşului Dubai, iar autorităţile intenţionează să facă din acest aeroport baza de operaţiuni a companiei aeriene Emirates până în 2025. Luna trecută, guvernul din Dubai a anunţat că master planul pentru cea de a doua fază de dezvoltare a aeroportului Al Maktoum International a fost aprobat în condiţiile în care Dubai International, deja cel mai mare aeroport din lume în funcţie de traficul internaţional, se apropie de capacitatea maximă şi nu dispune de spaţiu suplimentar.
Capital (http://www.capital.ro/dubai-vrea-sa-construiasca-cel-mai-mare-aeroport-din-lume.html)
Stai asa, Aeroportul Al Maktoum exista de cel putin 2 ani.
Parca Wizz Air acolo aterizeaza/ateriza.
harta google (https://www.google.ro/maps/place/Al+Maktoum+International+Airport-DWC+(DWC)/@24.8954952,55.140941,6823m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0xa27756b3aca0d918!8m2!3d24.8977876!4d55.1431018)
Nu e inca tot gata, dar e operational si e mai tot timpul gol.
Parcă are mai mult de doi ani de când este construit. Este o investiție începută dinaintea crizei din 2007, au renunțat o perioadă la proiect. Se încearcă resuscitarea lui odată cu Expoziția Mondială. Când am fost acolo în februarie, au semnat extinderea metroului până la noul aeroport. Treburile nu mai merg chiar așa de bine pe acolo, au o mulțime de proiecte abandonate, chiar și Earth.
Acum 2 ani am fost acolo. Doar ca am emrs cu Tarom si am aterizat pe Dubai. Dar stiu ca WIZZ ateriza de atunci pe al Maktoum care urma sa devina un colos.
LAX
(http://i.imgur.com/gl1mUWT.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/eJaiwpU.jpg)
Paul G. Ellinger (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=580452399)
https://www.facebook.com/BBCworldhacks/videos/1875409989383455/
Cum isi planifica altii viitorul..
TPE - Planificarea pana in 2020 pt T3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNuemNoaV94
Planificare pana in 2030 cu a treia pista
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0xj4973TeE
HKG masterplan 2030
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qylm5kptZ5c
SIN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXVYc_IDygw
KUL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cqWN1AdhU4
Cam asa se fac studiile, calculele pentru a decide corect care e directia de urmat..
In ultimii ani am avut zboruri si lay-over-uri spre/prin 5 aeroporturi majore din Asia KUL, SIN, TPE, HKG si MNL.. Primele 4 au planuri de extindere mari(KUL deja le-a com finalizat)..MNL nu prea mai are loc fiind prea in oras.
Exceptand MNL celelalte 4 au superconectivitate cu trenuri, HSR, autobuze etc
Ideea e ca toata lumea investeste contand pe cresteri semnificative ale traficului..
Si ajungem la OTP unde e la fel de clar ca o crestere procentuala de peste 15% va da aeroportul peste cap in numai 3-4 ani(deja sunt semne cu 4 ghisee la control pasapoarte Sosiri..o zona foarte foarte stramta unde asteptand intr-o zona plina ochi, te poti amuza vazand stewardese sic de la Qatar si Aeroflot zicand "escuse me" incercand sa treaca de "femei cu fuste lungi pitoresti cu bebe in brate" ce raspund "hah"..)
Practic construirea/extinderea de noi facilitati(gen T2) la OTP ar fi trebuit deja inceputa pentru a tine pasu' cu cererea sau in cel mai rau caz sa inceapa cat de curand. Dar nu se aude mare lucru..
Are cumva cineva ceva in 3D cu viitoarea dezvolatare a OTP? Chiar sunt curios sa vad amplasamentul T2 (am postat si pe SSC dar pana acum fara raspuns)
3d nu cred ca exista
(http://m.click.ro/news/national/pe-acest-camp-se-extinde-aeroportul)
Atentie la titlu, este FALS. Cel mai "mare" (adica aglomerat) aeroport este Hartsfield din Atlanta (Georgia). Si parca si Beijing-ul este peste Dubai. DXB e pe 3.
Dubai își menține și în 2017 titlul de cel mai aglomerat aeroport din lume
Dubai și-a menținut în 2017 titlul de cel mai aglomerat aeroport din lume pentru pasagerii internaționali, deși ritmul de creștere al traficului de pasageri a fost cel mai lent din ultimii nouă ani, transmite Reuters. Traficul anual a crescut cu 5,5% anul trecut, la 88,2 milioane de pasageri, față de 83,6 milioane de pasageri în 2016, a informat operatorul aeroportului internațional Dubai, scrie Agerpres. Pentru acest an se previzionează un avans al traficului de 2,4%, la 90,3 milioane de pasageri.
Profit.ro (https://www.profit.ro/povesti-cu-profit/dubai-isi-mentine-si-in-2017-titlul-de-cel-mai-aglomerat-aeroport-din-lume-17849911)
Aeroportul internațional Ben Gurion
(https://i.imgur.com/7XzG5nHh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/7XzG5nH.jpg)
Powered by API/PUM imgur uploader (http://proinfrastructura.ro/poze.html)
Cele mai bune aeroporturi din lume in 2018
Pe 21 martie, in cadrul Skytrax World Airport Awards 2018, au fost anuntate cele mai bune aeroporturi din lume. Pentru al 6-lea an consecutiv, Singapore Changi a ocupat primul loc. Ceremonia a avut loc la Passenger Terminal EXPO in Stockholm. Din 1999 si pana acum, premiile Skytrax World Airport sunt decernate pe baza voturilor pasagerilor in cadrul celui mai complex sondaj de acest gen. Sondajul este realizat ca unul independent, fara taxe de participare sau tarife din partea aeroporturilor, iar folosirea logo-ului de catre castigatori si a informatiilor conexe este gratuita.
Premiil 2018 se bazeaza pe 13,73 de milioane de chestionare completate de peste 100 de nationalitati. Sondajul s-a desfasurat intre august 2017 si februarie 2018 in 550 de aeroporturi din intreaga lume, fiind incluse aspecte legate de check-in, sosiri, transfer, shopping, control de securitate si al frontierei, respectiv plecari. Sondajul a fost realizat in engleza, spaniola si chineza. Lista completa a castigatorilor. (http://www.worldairportawards.com/main/2018_airportawards_announced.html)
(https://i.imgur.com/m5SFyJP.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/WvBw2Mg.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/n6d1K8J.png)
Aeronews.ro (http://aeronews.ro/cele-mai-bune-aeroporturi-din-lume-in-2018/)
Istanbul Ataturk Airport(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/32c59bf7f8c01094b8e17d647cd645cb.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/f8044260fac3c1a5a7e71a571fc71c31.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/b22ac3500cdbfb21318a8822e3c1057e.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/7fee1542b7bbbd0436c3affd002e8d6b.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/21418c986d37ec82d655605097b7b011.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/3e6312665af6dd7dbd3c92d9091c92ce.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/510b7fafc9757cdfe5f7f968156a47e4.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/fd6697bd0691e9450f4ae9709fb842ba.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180501/21acff500e965281bab6d914d46049a1.jpg)
Trimis de pe al meu SM-G950F folosind Tapatalk
Routesonline prezintă topul celor mai aglomerate rute aeriene în 2017
Primele zece cele mai aglomerate rute aeriene din lume
1. Jeju – Seul Gimpo (CJU-GMP – 13.460.306 pasageri);
2. Melbourne – Sydney Kingsford Smith (MEL-SYD – 9.090.941 pasageri);
3. Sapporo – Tokyo Haneda (CTS-HND – 8.726.502 pasageri);
4. Fukuoka – Tokyo Haneda (FUK-HND – 7.864.000 pasageri);
5. Mumbai – Delhi (BOM-DEL – 7.129.943 pasageri);
6. Beijing Capital – Shanghai Hongqiao (PEK-SHA – 6.833.684 pasageri);
7. Hanoi – Ho Chi Minh City (HAN-SGN – 6.769.823 pasageri);
8. Hong Kong – Taiwan Taoyuan (HKG-TPE – 6.719.030 pasageri);
9. Jakarta – Juanda Surabaya (CGK-SUB – 5.271.304 pasageri);
10. Tokyo Haneda – Okinawa (HND-OKA – 5.269.481 pasageri).
Primele zece cele mai aglomerate rute aeriene internaționale din lume
1. Hong Kong – Taiwan Taoyuan (HKG-TPE – 6.719.030 pasageri);
2. Jakarta – Singapore Changi (CGK-SIN – 4.810.602 pasageri);
3. Hong Kong – Shanghai Pudong (HKG-PVG – 4.162.347 pasageri);
4. Kuala Lumpur – Singapore Changi (KUL-SIN – 4.108.824 pasageri);
5. Bangkok Suvarnabhumi – Hong Kong (BKK-HKG – 3.438.628 pasageri);
6. Dubai – Londra Heathrow (DXB-LHR – 3.210.121 pasageri);
7. Hong Kong – Seul Incheon (HKG-ICN – 3.198.132 pasageri);
8. Hong Kong – Singapore Changi (HKG-SIN – 3.147.384 pasageri);
9. New York JFK – Londra Heathrow (JFK-LHR – 2.972.817 pasageri);
10. Hong Kong – Beijing Capital (HKG-PEK – 2.962.707 pasageri).
Citește articolul pe https://boardingpass.ro/routesonline-prezinta-topul-celor-mai-aglomerate-rute-aeriene-in-2017/
Topul ăsta zice că Asia este centrul lumii...
;)
Deseară ar trebui să înceapă deschiderea noului aeroport din Istanbul și transferul treptat al tuturor operațiunilor de pe Ataturk. În afara tuturor știrilor de pe canalele clasice, sunt curios să vedem impresii ale primilor utilizatori ai acestei infrastructuri.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdTfZqPilYs
Eu am bielete la istanbul cu turkish in martie 2019 si inca nu am primit nicio notificare ca s-a schimbat aeroportul. Pe site in continuare apare IST. Stie cineva ceva?
Din ianuarie se va muta, o sa primesti cand e cazul.
Dupa mutare, noul aeroport va primi tot codul IST (vechiul aeroport se va inchide). Poate nici nu o sa primesti vreo notificare, ca tot pe IST o sa ajungi.
Nu se muta toate operatiile de pe vechiul pe noul aeroport pana in martie...
New, additional flights will be operated from Istanbul New Airport to Ankara, Antalya, Izmir, Azerbaijan (Baku) and TRNC (Ercan) until December 30.
Pursuant to existing planning, on December 31, all operations will move from Istanbul Atatürk Airport, after which, all flights will operate from the new Istanbul Airport.
Cam asta spune Turkish-ul. Se vor muta de pe o zi pe alta.
"All our operations after [December 31, 2018] will be carried out at Istanbul New Airport," the Turkish carrier said in a statement.
Aeroportul din Istanbul va deveni un ,,mega-hub" al sectorului aviatic
Noul aeroport din Istanbul va constitui un megahub la nivel mondial şi o locomotivă pentru sectorul aviatic al Turciei, a afirmat Ilker Ayci, preşedinte al boardului Turkish Airlines, potrivit Hurriyet Daily News. ,,Turcia va deveni unul din centrele importante ale lumii pentru sectorul aviaţiei comerciale", a adăugat oficialul turc. Prima fază a aeroportului a fost finalizată pe 29 octombrie, iar zborurile comerciale au fost lansate la începutul lunii noiembrie. Potrivit lui Ayci, facilitatea va adăuga 73 miliarde de lire (aproape 14 mld. $), sau 4,9% din PIB, economiei turce.
ZF (https://www.zf.ro/business-international/aeroportul-din-istanbul-va-deveni-un-mega-hub-al-sectorului-aviatic-17749670)
China își va dubla numărul de aeroporturi
China vrea să crească numărul de aeroporturi de pe teritoriul său cu aproape 100% până în 2035, totalul urmând să ajungă la 450, scrie AFP care citează presa națională. Traficul aerian va ajunge să reprezinte o treime din totalul modalităților de transport în cea mai populată țară din lume. În China sunt 234 de aeroporturi acum și alte 216 vor fi construite în următorii 17 ani. Până atunci se estimează că țara asiatică va fi numărul unu mondial la numărul de călătorii cu avionul, cu un sfert din totalul mondial. În 2017 s-au înregistrat în total 552 de milioane de călătorii de pe aeroporturile chinezești, estimarea fiind că se va ajunge la 720 milioane în 2020.
Hotnews (https://monitorizari.hotnews.ro/stiri-infrastructura_articole-22860120-china-isi-dubla-numarul-aeroporturi.htm)
China reveals plans for carrier relocation to Beijing's new airport
BEIJING: China's aviation regulator published on Thursday (Jan 3) plans for airline relocation to Beijing's new mega-airport set to open this year and said it would let foreign carriers decide which of the capital's airports they will use. Beijing Daxing International Airport, due to open in September, will accommodate 72 million passengers a year by 2025 and is expected to become one of the world's busiest airports upon completion. This will be the city's second such facility and help relieve pressure on Beijing Capital International Airport, whose annual capacity has reached 100 million passengers.
Channel News Asia (https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/china-reveals-plans-for-carrier-relocation-to-beijing-s-new-airport-11083436?fbclid=IwAR0gA7LZ5Ntsmy8TjZuMNaifvhi-pg0pESsrk1vhwtvhiPnPmx8tzRh3gVU)
Noul aeroport din Istanbul va înlocui aeroportul Ataturk din 3 martie
Aeroportul internaţional Ataturk din Istanbul, al cincilea ca mărime din Europa, îşi va închide porţile pentru zborurile de pasageri începând cu data de 3 martie 2019 şi va transfera ştafeta către noul Istanbul Airport, a confirmat luni un purtător de cuvânt al operatorului aeroportuar IGA, transmite EFE. "Transferul va începe luni, 1 martie, şi începând din ziua de 3 martie toate zborurile de pasageri se vor efectua de pe noul aeroport, lăsând vechiului aeroport zborurile avioanelor de marfă", a declarat directorul de comunicare de la IGA, Gökhan Sengül.
Noul aeroport, care începând cu data de 2 martie va moşteni sigla IST, va avea iniţial două piste de aterizare, urmând ca din 2020 să i se adauge o a treia pistă, a precizat Sengül. Încă de la început, instalaţiile noului aeroport vor avea capacitatea teoretică de a gestiona 80 de zboruri pe oră (40 de decolări şi 40 de aterizări), ceea ce va permite un număr de maxim 2.000 de zboruri pe zi, o cifră clar mai mare decât recordul de 1.500 de zboruri pe zi al actualului aeroport Ataturk.
Dacă în prezent aeroportul internaţional Ataturk din Istanbul este tranzitat de peste 60 de milioane de pasageri pe an, noul aeroport aspiră să ajungă la 90 de milioane de pasageri în 2019 pentru ca în cursul unui deceniu să ajungă la o capacitate de 200 milioane de pasageri pe an.
Construcţia noului aeroport internaţional din Istanbul a început în 2015 pe un teren unde înainte era o mină deschisă de cărbune pe coasta Mării Negre, la aproximativ 35 kilometri nord -vest de centrul istoric al Istanbulului. Oficial, aeroportul a fost inaugurat în data de 29 octombrie 2018, cu ocazia zilei naţionale, dar deocamdată găzduieşte doar un număr redus de zboruri ale companiei Turkish Airlines, inclusiv unele spre Paris, Frankfurt, München şi Moscova. Chiar dacă planurile vizează conectarea noului aeroport cu Istanbul via o linie de metrou, pentru moment sunt doar câteva linii de autobuz care au nevoie de aproximativ o oră pentru a face naveta între oraş şi noul aeroport.
Agerpres (https://www.agerpres.ro/economic-extern/2019/01/21/noul-aeroport-din-istanbul-va-inlocui-aeroportul-ataturk-din-3-martie--244693)
Aeroportul din Dubai și-a păstrat titlul de cel mai mare aeroport internațional din lume, dar ratează ținta
Aeroportul Internațional din Dubai a înregistrat 89,1 milioane de pasageri în 2018, ratându-și ținta pe care și-a propus-o, dar cu toate acestea a rămas cel mai mare aeroport internațional din lume, transmite Reuters. Operatorul Dubai Airports a anunțat luni că traficul de pasageri a avansat cu un procent anul trecut, cel mai slab ritm de creștere anual din ultimul deceniu, astfel că nu a putut fi atinsă ținta de 90,3 milioane de pasageri preconizată, scrie Agerpres.
Profit.ro (https://www.profit.ro/povesti-cu-profit/auto-transporturi/aeroportul-din-dubai-si-a-pastrat-titlul-de-cel-mai-mare-aeroport-international-din-lume-dar-rateaza-tinta-18830710)
Din data de 6 aprilie 2019 ora 2, incepe transferul zborurilor comerciale pe noul aeroport Istanbul, proces care se va incheia in data de 6 aprilie ora 14.
Deasemeni se va transera si codul IATA, IST la noul aeroport. Noul cod IATA pentru Ataturk va fi ISL
Prima faza de constructie a noului aeroport a fost construita in numai 3 ani, din 2015 pana in 2018, octombrie cand au inceeput sa fie operational. Mai urmeaza inca 3 etape, pana in 2030...
In etapa a doua, va mai fi contruita inca o pista , iar in etapele 3 si 4 vor mai fi construite inca 2 (doua) terminale si cu piste adiacente.....
La final, aeroportul va avea 6 piste , 16 taxiways si o capacitate de 150 milioane de pasageri....
Pe 5 si 6 aprilie, Turkish Airlines isi muta operatiunile pe noul aeroport din Istanbul
Marea Mutare, asa cum a denumit-o Turkish Airlines, a inceput pe 5 aprilie la 03:00, dureaza 45 de ore si se va incheia pe 6 aprilie la 23:59 ora locala.
Cele doua aeroporturi mari din Istanbul, Ataturk si noul aeroport, vor fi inchise 12 ore pentru toate zborurile de pasageri intre 02:00, 6 aprilie si ora 14:00 in aceeasi zi. Ulterior, zborurile Turkish Airlines operate de pe noul aeroport vor creste progresiv. Din 6 aprilie, ora locala 03:00, noul aeroport va prelua codul IST de la Ataturk, acesta urmand sa primeasca codul ISL si sa deserveasca zboruri VIP + cargo.
In timpul Marii Mutari vor fi carate echipamente ce cantaresc aproape 47.300 de tone intre cele doua aeroporturi. De la masinarii de 44 tone pentru tractarea avioanelor si pana la elemente electronice, peste 10.000 de piese de echipament vor fi mutate, ceea ce echivaleaza cu 5000 de remorci de camioane. Distanta acoperita in cele 45 de ore de aceste camioane este calculata la 400.000 km, adica de 10 ori in jurul Terrei. Peste 1800 de persoane sunt implicate in Marea Mutare.
Aeronews (http://aeronews.ro/video-pe-5-si-6-aprilie-turkish-airlines-isi-muta-operatiunile-pe-noul-aeroport-din-istanbul/)
Pun si eu cateva aeroporturi in care am fost.
Pe departe cel mai mare ,Hong Kong.Am inteles ca arcadele care sustin acoperisul ar fi cele mai mari din lume...
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.314189910833335,113.92512512194445)
(https://i.imgur.com/WvJelFUh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/WvJelFU.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/SZMHtJkh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/SZMHtJk.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.312948226666666,113.92766571027778)
(https://i.imgur.com/sRk2T7Hh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/sRk2T7H.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.313514709444444,113.93067169166667)
(https://i.imgur.com/GS7SJXlh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/GS7SJXl.jpg)
Si un mic timelapse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8agzpFi63KY
Asta e Xiamen,un aeroport nou,insa din pacate nu am detalii.Calitatea constructiei lasa de dorit,in special vopselele care se decojesc si geamurile prin care ploua doar la 1 an de la inaugurare..Au si chinezii bubele lor...
Dealfel aeroportul deserveste si un intreg complex unde se face reconversie si mentenanta ale avioanelor,clienti ca Luftansa,Cathay,British Airlines...etc.In zona unde am avut clientul nostru testau ,atentie,turbinele full throthle,cu avionul la 50 de metri de blocuri de locuinte...
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=24.54438209527778,118.13970184305556)
(https://i.imgur.com/8dQr3vHh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/8dQr3vH.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=24.54438209527778,118.13970184305556)
(https://i.imgur.com/WWka7IDh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/WWka7ID.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=24.54305458055556,118.13832855222223)
(https://i.imgur.com/tFTcIhoh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/tFTcIho.jpg)
Asta e Aeroportul Shenzen,In forma de avion,super interesant meshul acoperisului,foarte mare si cu trafic destul de mare.
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.62527777777778,113.8086111111111)
(https://i.imgur.com/pEwKc7rh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/pEwKc7r.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.62527777777778,113.8086111111111)
(https://i.imgur.com/pZJntLbh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/pZJntLb.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.62611111111111,113.80777777777777)
(https://i.imgur.com/vnVUZeAh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/vnVUZeA.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.62666666666667,113.80749999999999)
(https://i.imgur.com/kDM3IaDh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/kDM3IaD.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.62666666666667,113.80749999999999)
(https://i.imgur.com/3p4ztq9h.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/3p4ztq9.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.6275,113.80916666666667)
(https://i.imgur.com/0BIEVlCh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/0BIEVlC.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.625833333333333,113.80805555555555)
(https://i.imgur.com/WqZ0AjLh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/WqZ0AjL.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=22.625833333333333,113.80805555555555)
(https://i.imgur.com/XsaDalqh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/XsaDalq.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/Pt3ODzrh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/Pt3ODzr.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/gfQqMBEh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/gfQqMBE.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/iy2UPSgh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/iy2UPSg.jpg)
Hamad international airport.
(https://i.imgur.com/sOAuMhGh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/sOAuMhG.jpg)
Powered by API/PUM imgur uploader (http://proinfrastructura.ro/poze.html)
@kitsune: cand mai ai escala in Doha, poti sa treci pe aici:
https://www.facebook.com/198317336853861/posts/4591864520832432/?d=n
Eh, la cât de greu e azi de făcut un schimb de echipaj... rar o să ajung. Nici nu prea am de obicei mult timp in Doha.
Dar mulțumesc pentru info.
Uganda își pierde principalul aeroport în fața Chinei, pentru un împrumut
Guvernul din Uganda a pierdut principalul aeroport internațional al țării. Acesta a fost preluat de China în contul unui împrumut de peste 200 milioane dolari, pentru care autoritățile din Uganda nu au reușit să-și plătească dobânda, susține timesofindia. Banii au fost împrumutați de la Export-Import Bank of China în 2015, pentru extinderea aeroportului Entebbe, folosit pentru a garanta creditul.
Pe de altă parte, oficialii din două țări susțin că încă sunt discuții pentru a se încerca modificarea acordului de împrumut, astfel încât Guvernul din Uganda să nu piardă controlul asupra singurului aeroport internațional al națiunii.
Uganda, cu pestee 45 milioane locuitori, are ca principală activitate agricultura, exportând cafea, bumbac și trestie de zahăr, fiind una dintre cele mai sărace țări africane.
În Sri Lanka, Guvernul a fost de acord, în 2017, să închirieze un port unei întreprinderi conduse de China Merchants Port Holdings Co. pentru 99 de ani, în schimbul a 1,1 miliarde de dolari.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd0WMpopJbo
Sursa. (https://www.profit.ro/must-read/inedit-video-uganda-isi-pierde-principalul-aeroport-in-fata-chinei-pentru-un-imprumut-20485020)
Top 50 cele mai aglomerate aeroporturi din lume:
(https://i.imgur.com/5XfnwUs.jpeg)
(pentru mărire: click pe imagine)
Lista completă cu 748 de aeroporturi (download): AICI. (https://dl.orangedox.com/busiest2021)
Sursa: @bubbalo (SSC) (https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/airport-statistics.262025/page-186#post-177191708)
Aterizarea la Singapore
https://youtu.be/q8R6u2-z20M
Aeroportul Punta Cana-Republica Dominicana
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=18.561975,-68.364474)
(https://i.imgur.com/Od9XFVbh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/Od9XFVb.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=18.562128972222222,-68.36428799999999)
(https://i.imgur.com/Jyg7v4hh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/Jyg7v4h.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=18.561682972222222,-68.36451799999999)
(https://i.imgur.com/86jB5unh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/86jB5un.jpg)
(GPS) (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=18.562796972222223,-68.36499297222221)
(https://i.imgur.com/UzysjDqh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/UzysjDq.jpg)
Powered by API/PUM imgur uploader (https://proinfrastructura.ro/poze.html)
Acum o săptămână a aterizat primul avion pe noul aeroport internațional din Luanda, Angola:(https://www.skyscrapercity.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect,width=1920,height=1920,fit=scale-down/https://www.skyscrapercity.com/attachments/1655610301402-png.3379454/)
Vrei să pleci dar numa numa...
(https://i.imgur.com/jBb4zyJh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/jBb4zyJ.jpg)
Powered by API/PUM imgur uploader (https://proinfrastructura.ro/poze.html)
PS: ca să nu mai ziceți că sunt criptic:
(https://i.imgur.com/IlVtBgjh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/IlVtBgj.jpg)
8) :cool: Un haiduc și Picasso...
YUL acum:
(https://i.imgur.com/BbOzqxsh.jpg) (https://i.imgur.com/BbOzqxs.jpg)
Powered by API/PUM imgur uploader (https://proinfrastructura.ro/poze.html)